首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同药物预防老年患者颈丛阻滞后心血管副反应的临床疗效观察
引用本文:王艳云.不同药物预防老年患者颈丛阻滞后心血管副反应的临床疗效观察[J].医学临床研究,2011,28(3):491-493.
作者姓名:王艳云
作者单位:邵阳医专附属医院麻醉科,湖南,邵阳,422000
摘    要:目的]比较乌拉地尔、尼卡地平预防颈丛阻滞后心血管副反应的临床效果和安全性.方法]将60例择期行甲状腺瘤手术的年龄大于60岁的患者随机分为A,B,C三组,每组20例.在颈丛阻滞完成后立即给予药物静脉注射:A组乌拉地尔0.5 mg/kg,B组尼卡地平15 μg/kg,C组生理盐水2 mL.分别记录颈丛阻滞前、阻滞后即时,5,10,20,30 min的收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),心率(HR),观察麻醉效果.结果]总有效率:A组95% ,B组90% ,C组95%,三组比较差异均无显著性(P〉0.05).SBP:A、B两组给药后5 min、20 min、30 min与麻醉前比较,无显著性差异(P〉0.05);DBP:A组麻醉后20 min、30 min 与麻醉前比较,无显著性差异(P〉0.05) ;B组麻醉后20 min较麻醉前比较,无显著性差异(P〉0.05),C组麻醉后5 min、10 min、15 min、20 min SBP、DBP较麻醉前明显上升(P〈0.05);在HR方面,阻滞后3组与麻醉前相比均增加,在A组给药后10 min下降至正常水平,而B、C两组持续到给药后20 min;颈丛阻滞后30 min,各组HR趋于稳定.结论]使用乌拉地尔0.5 mg/kg和尼卡地平15 μg/kg均可有效的预防老年患者颈丛阻滞后心血管副作用,且乌拉地尔效果优于尼卡地平.

关 键 词:颈丛  神经传导阻滞  心血管疾病/预防和控制

Observation on the Clinical Efficacy of Different Drugs for Preventing Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions in Elderly Patients After Cervical Plexus Block
WANG Yan-yun.Observation on the Clinical Efficacy of Different Drugs for Preventing Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions in Elderly Patients After Cervical Plexus Block[J].Journal of Clinical Research,2011,28(3):491-493.
Authors:WANG Yan-yun
Institution:WANG Yan -yun (Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang Medical School, Hunan 422000, China )
Abstract:Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of urapidil vs. nicardipine for preventing cardiovascular adverse reactions in elderly patients after cervical plexus block. Methods] Sixty patients aged over 60 years old and scheduled for the surgery of thyroma were randomly divided into group A, group B and group C with 20 cases in each. All patients were given intravenous injection of the drugs after ceivical plexus block. Group A was injected with urapidil 0.5mg/kg, and group B was injected with nicardipine 15μg/kg, and group C received normal saline 2ml. The SBP, DBP and HR were recorded before the anesthesia, at the same t{me of anesthesia, at 5rain, 10rain, 20min and 30rain after anesthesia. The anesthetic effect was observed. Results] The total effective rate of group A, group 13 and group C was 95%, 90% and 95%, respectively, and there was no significant differ ence among 3 groups( P 〉0.05). Compared with before anesthesia, there was no significant difference in SBP at 5rain, 20min and 30min between group A and group B( P 〉0.05). There was no significant difference in DBP in group A between 20min and 30min after anesthesia and before anesthesia( P 〉0. 05). There was no significant difference in DBP in group B 20min after anesthesia and before anesthesia( P 〉0.05). Compared with before anesthesia, the SBP and DBP at 5min, 10min, 15min and 20min after anesthesia in group C were significantly increased ( P 〈0.05). Compared before anesthesia, the HR in 3 groups after anesthesia was increased, and that in group A returned to normal level at 10min after administration, but that in group B and group C returned to normal level at 20min after administration. At 30min after anesthesia, the HR in 3 groups became stable. Conclusion] Urapidil 0.5mg/kg and nicardipine 15μg/kg can effectively prevent cardiovascular adverse reactions in elderly patients after cervical plexus block, and the effect of urapidil is better than nicardipine.
Keywords:cervical plexus  nerve block  cardiovascular diseases/PC
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号