混合痔常见手术方式临床应用的对比观察

目的 比较改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)与开放式痔切除术(Milligan-Morgan术,MMH)、闭合式痔切除术(Ferguson-Mitchell术,FMH)治疗Ⅲ～Ⅳ度混和痔的临床效果.方法 对收治的45例Ⅲ～Ⅳ度痔病患者随机分为三组,分别对改良PPH术和MMH术及FMH术进行回顾性分析,并分别对手术时间、术后疼痛指数、住院时间、恢复工作时间、术后并发症、患者满意度等进行比较分析.结果 改良PPH手术组在缩短手术时间、减轻术后疼痛、肛门分泌物、患者满意度等有效性方面有一定优势.结论 改良PPH术治疗Ⅲ～Ⅳ度混合痔安全、有效并优于传统的MMH和FMH手术.

Study of the clinical effect in the treatment of the mixed hemorrhoids

Objective To compare the clinical effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)improved,Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoideeomy and Ferguson-Mitchell hemorrhoidecomy in the treatment of the Ⅲ～Ⅳdegree mixed hemorrhoids.Methods 45 cases admitted for surgical treatment of Ⅲ～Ⅳ degree hemorrhoids,were randomly divided into 3 groups,the improved PPH,MMH and FMH were retrospectively reviewed,and it is separately reviewed for the operation time,pain index,length of hospital stay,return to normal activity time,postoperation complication and patients satisfaction etc.Results There was reasonably evidence in favor improved PPH for operating time,hospital stay,pain,anal discharge,and patients satisfaction.Conclusion The improved PPH is a safe and effective procedure for Ⅲ～Ⅳ hemorrhoids and its short-term outcome is more better than Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson-Mitchdl group.