首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison between BCNU and procarbazine chemotherapy for treatment of gliomas
Authors:Herbert B. Newton  Judith Bromberg  Larry Junck  Michaelyn A. Page  Harry S. Greenberg
Affiliation:(1) Departments of Neurology and Biostatistics, University of Michigan, USA;(2) Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, USA
Abstract:Summary We compared sequential single-agent BCNU and procarbazine (PCB) chemotherapy in 31 patients with gliomas [grade IV (10), grade III (15), grade II (6)]. Patients had failed surgical biopsy ± resection and radiation therapy. All patients were treated initially with BCNU 150-300mg/m2 by intra-arterial or intravenous route every 6 weeks. After CT evidence of tumor progression, all patients received PCB 150mg/m2/day for 28 days every 8 weeks. Patient responses to BCNU were CR (0), PR (7), SD (12), progression (12), and to PCB CR (2), PR (9), SD (6), and progression (14). Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time to failure for all patients were shorter for BCNU, 5.0 months (range 1.5–20), than for PCB, 6.0 months (range 2–50+). There was a statistically significant difference (Mantel-Cox test, p=0.02) in the distribution of time to disease progression between the two drugs, especially for grade III tumors (p= 0.02). The cumulative proportion of patients without disease progression at 6 months was 26% while on BCNU, compared to 48% while on PCB; at 12 months the cumulative proportions were 3% for BCNU compared to 35% for PCB. Although there was no formal washout period between administration of the two drugs, no carryover effect was evident. These data provide further evidence that PCB has significant activity against malignant glioma and may, in fact, be more effective than BCNU.
Keywords:procarbazine  nitrosourea chemotherapy  recurrent glioma
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号