首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

断指再植患者术后血管危象危险因素的meta分析
引用本文:刘凤璟 刘辉文 王美玲 陈碧贞. 断指再植患者术后血管危象危险因素的meta分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(15): 2073-2078. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.15.001
作者姓名:刘凤璟 刘辉文 王美玲 陈碧贞
作者单位:1福建中医药大学护理学院,福州 350100;2福州市第二医院手外科,福州 350000;3福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院医院感染管理处,福州 350003
基金项目:福建省科学技术厅、福建省创伤骨科急救与康复临床医学研究中心(2020Y2014)
摘    要:目的 系统评价断指再植术后血管危象的危险因素。方法 检索数据库万方、知网、维普、中国生物医学、Web of Science、PubMed、The Cochrane Library,检索时限为建库至2022年4月30日。由2名研究人员按照纳入和排除标准,独立进行文献筛选、资料提取、文献评价,运用Revman 5.3软件进行危险因素的meta分析,统计结果用比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示,异质性检验当P≥0.1且I2<50%时采用固定效应模型,P<0.1和/或I2≥50%,采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果 最终纳入9篇文献,共1 728例患者,发生血管危象303例,血管危象发生率为21.26%。meta分析显示,性别(女性)(OR=3.73,95%CI 2.04~6.82,P<0.000 01)、年龄<12岁(OR=4.71,95%CI 3.41~6.50,P<0.000 01)、吸烟史(OR=4.06,95%CI 3.08~5.35,P<0.000 01)、缺血时间>10 h(OR=3.04,95%CI 1.52~6.07,P=0.002)、伤因(挤压撕脱伤)(OR=4.09,95%CI 2.89~5.78,P<0.000 01)、离断平面(末节离断)(OR=4.1095%CI 3.03~5.54,P<0.000 01)是断指再植术后血管危象的危险因素。结论 断指再植术后血管危象发生率较高,应针对女性、低龄、有吸烟史、缺血时间长、挤压撕脱伤、末节离断等再植患者采取有针对性的预防措施,以减少血管危象的发生,提高断指再植的成活率。

关 键 词:断指再植术  血管危象  危险因素  meta分析  
收稿时间:2022-05-17

Meta-analysis of risk factors of postoperative vascular crisis inpatients after severed finger replantation
Liu Fengjing Liu Huiwen Wang Meiling Chen Bizhen. Meta-analysis of risk factors of postoperative vascular crisis inpatients after severed finger replantation[J]. International Medicine & Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(15): 2073-2078. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.15.001
Authors:Liu Fengjing Liu Huiwen Wang Meiling Chen Bizhen
Affiliation:1 Nursing School, Fujian University of TraditionalChinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350100, China; 2 Department of HandSurgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, China;3 NosocomialInfection Management Office, Second People's Hospital, Fujian University ofTraditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350003, China
Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the risk factors of vascular crisis afterreplantation of severed fingers. Methods The databasesWanfang, CNKI, VIP, China Biomedicine, Web of Science, PubMed, and The CochraneLibrary were searched from their establishment to April 30, 2022. According tothe inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screenedthe literatures, extracted the data, and evaluated the literatures. The Revman5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis of risk factors. The results wereexpressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95%confidence interval (CI). When P≥0.1 and I2<50%,the fixed effect model was used for the meta analysis. When P<0.1 and/or I2≥50%, the randomeffect model was used for the meta analysis. Results A total of 9 literatures were included, including 1 728 patients, and303 patients had vascular crisis, and the incidence of vascular crisis was21.26%. Meta analysis showed that gender (women) (OR=3.73, 95%CI 2.04-6.82, P<0.000 01), age < 12 years (OR=4.71, 95%CI 3.41-6.50, P<0.00001), smoking history (OR=4.06, 95%CI 3.08-5.35, P<0.000 01), ischemic time > 10 hours (OR=3.04, 95%CI 1.52-6.07, P=0.002), cause of injury (crushavulsion injury) (OR=4.09, 95%CI 2.89-5.78, P<0.00001), and dissociation plane (distal segment dissociation)(OR=4.10, 95%CI 3.03-5.54, P<0.00001) were the risk factors of vascular crisis after finger replantation. Conclusions The incidence ofvascular crisis after replantation of severed fingers is high. Targetedpreventive measures should be taken for replantation patients such as female,young age, smoking history, long ischemic time, crush avulsion injury, anddistal segment disconnection, so as to reduce the incidence of vascular crisisand improve the severed fingers' survival rate after replantation.
Keywords:Replantation of severed fingers  Vascular crisis  Risk factors  Meta-analysis  
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号