首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

4R危机管理理论在脓毒症患者胃肠功能障碍预防管理中的应用
引用本文:黄素嫦 温桂香 余静 周敏 韩治军. 4R危机管理理论在脓毒症患者胃肠功能障碍预防管理中的应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(22): 3144-3148. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.22.008
作者姓名:黄素嫦 温桂香 余静 周敏 韩治军
作者单位:1广东省第二中医院急诊科,广州 510000;2广东省第二中医院黄埔医院骨三科,广州 510000
基金项目:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(20201120112752919)
摘    要:目的 探讨4R危机管理理论在脓毒症患者胃肠功能障碍预防管理中的应用效果。方法 选择2020年12月至2021年12月广东省第二中医院收治的82例脓毒症患者为研究对象进行前瞻性研究,运用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,各41例。对照组男23例、女18例,年龄(76.17±9.27)岁,实施脓毒症常规护理干预;观察组男22例、女19例,年龄(77.22±9.03)岁,在对照组基础上实施基于4R危机管理理论的胃肠功能障碍预防管理。比较两组患者急性生理与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、胃肠功能损伤评分、胃肠功能障碍发生率以及护理满意度。计量资料行独立样本t检验,计数资料行χ2检验。结果 干预后,观察组APACHEⅡ评分、胃肠功能损伤评分[(19.41±3.15)分、(24.85±4.49)分]均低于对照组[(23.27±3.41)分、(29.07±5.12)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=5.315、3.969,均P<0.001)。干预后,观察组患者胃肠功能障碍发生率为7.32%(3/41),明显低于对照组24.39%(10/41),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.479,P=0.034)。干预后,观察组患者护理总满意度为97.6%(40/41),高于对照组85.4%(35/41),差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.905,P=0.048)。结论 运用4R危机管理理论可改善脓毒症患者病情和胃肠功能,降低胃肠功能障碍发生率,提高护理满意度。

关 键 词:脓毒症  胃肠功能障碍  4R危机管理理论  预防  
收稿时间:2022-07-25

Application of 4R crisis management theory in the prevention managementof gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with sepsis
Huang Suchang,Wen Guixiang,Yu Jing,Zhou Min,Han Zhijun. Application of 4R crisis management theory in the prevention managementof gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with sepsis[J]. International Medicine & Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(22): 3144-3148. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.22.008
Authors:Huang Suchang  Wen Guixiang  Yu Jing  Zhou Min  Han Zhijun
Affiliation:1 Emergency Department, Guangdong SecondTraditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China; 2 TheThird Department of Orthopaedics, Huangpu Branch, Guangdong Second TraditionalChinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the application effect of 4R crisis management theory in theprevention management of gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Methods A total of 82 patients with sepsis treated inGuangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from December 2020 toDecember 2021 were selected as the research objects for a prospective study,and they were divided into a control group [23 males and 18 females, aged(76.17±9.27) years]and an observation group [22 males and 19 females, aged(77.22±9.03) years] with 41 cases in each group by the random number tablemethod. The control group received routine nursing intervention for sepsis, andthe observation group received preventive management of gastrointestinaldysfunction based on 4R crisis management theory. The score of Acute Physiologyand Chronic Health Evaluation Scoring System (APACHEⅡ), gastrointestinal function injury score,incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction, and nursing satisfaction werecompared between the two groups. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data, and χ2 test for the count data. Results After intervention, the APACHEⅡ score and gastrointestinal function injury score of the observationgroup [(19.41±3.15) and (24.85±4.49)] were lower than those of the controlgroup [(23.27±3.41) and (29.07±5.12)], with statistically significantdifferences (t=5.315 and 3.969; both P<0.001). After intervention, theincidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction in the observation group was 7.32%(3/41), which was significantly lower than 24.39% (10/41) in the control group,with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.479, P=0.034).After intervention, the total nursing satisfaction rate in the observationgroup was 97.6% (40/41), which was higher than 85.4% (35/41) in the controlgroup, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=3.905, P=0.048). Conclusion Applying 4R crisismanagement theory can improve the condition and gastrointestinal function inpatients with sepsis, reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction, andimprove the nursing satisfaction.
Keywords:Sepsis  Gastrointestinal dysfunction  4Rcrisis management theory  Prevention  
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号