首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

支气管肺泡灌洗术治疗危重患者的生存分析
引用本文:华县龙, 陈新玉, 赖汝标. 支气管肺泡灌洗术治疗危重患者的生存分析[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2016, 39(4): 373-375. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4500.2016.04.09
作者姓名:华县龙  陈新玉  赖汝标
作者单位:广东省翁源县人民医院重症医学科,广东 韶关 512600
基金项目:韶关市卫生和计划生育局推广应用新项目20141222
摘    要:目的探讨支气管肺泡灌洗术(BAL)治疗危重患者的生存期差异。方法收集重症监护室149例使用呼吸机辅助呼吸的重症患者作为观察对象,分为BAL组及未使用BAL的对照组,对患者进行2年的随访,使用Kaplan-Meier法比较两组的生存期差异。结果治疗后两组的APACHE II及简化急性生理评分II评分均明显下降,且均以BAL组上述两项评分显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组分别有5例及7例患者治疗1周内死亡,分别占6.94%及9.10%,第1周病死率无统计学差异(χ2=0.168,P=0.682)。BAL组最长生存期的患者大于124周,且该例患者删失;而对照组最长生存期为104周;BAL组的生存期的算术均数及中位数分别为43.5、30.0周,而对照组分别为33.2、25.0周,Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示BAL组的生存期显著长于对照组(χ2=4.419,P=0.036)。结论尽管使用与不使用BAL短期内对患者的生存率无明显差异,但使用BAL治疗的患者的生存期显著长于不使用BAL者,提示BAL可改善危重患者的远期预后。

关 键 词:支气管肺泡灌洗术   APACHE评分   SAPS评分   生存分析
收稿时间:2016-06-01

Survival analysis on the critical patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage
Xianlong HUA, Xinyu CHEN, Rubiao LAI. Survival analysis on the critical patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2016, 39(4): 373-375. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4500.2016.04.09
Authors:Xianlong HUA  Xinyu CHEN  Rubiao LAI
Affiliation:Department of Severe Medical Science, Wengyuan County People's Hospital of Guangdong, Shaoguan 512600, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the difference of survival time between patients with severe and severe patients treated with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).MethodsA total of 149 critical patients who received mechanical ventilator were enrolled and divided into the BAL and non-BAL groups. We performed 2 years followed-up and compared the survival times of 2 groups through Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsThe APACHE II and the acute physiology score II declined significantly after treatment for 2 groups. APACHE II as well SAPS II in the BAL group were significantly lower than those in the non-BAL group. There were 5 (6.94%) and 7 (9.10%) patients died during the first week, but the difference of mortality between the two groups was not significant (χ2=0.168, P=0.682). The longest survival time in BAL group was 124 weeks and the patient was censored, but the longest survival time in the non-BAL group was just 104 weeks. The arithmetic mean and median of survival times in BAL group were 33.2 and 25.0 weeks, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the survival times in the BAL group were apparently longer than those in the non-BAL group (χ2=4.419, P=0.036).ConclusionAlthough there is no significant difference of survival rate between the BAL and non-BAL group, patients in the BAL group have significantly longer survival times than those in the non-BAL group. Our study indicates that BAL can improve the prognosis for the critical patients who received mechanical ventilator. 
Keywords:bronchoalveolar lavage  APACHE score  SAPS scores  survival analysis
点击此处可从《分子影像学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《分子影像学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号