首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A pilot study of antipsychotic prescribing decisions for acutely-Ill hospitalized patients
Authors:Campbell E Cabrina  DeJesus Melissa  Herman Barry K  Cuffel Brian J  Sanders Kafi N  Dodge William  Dhopesh Vasant  Caroff Stanley N
Institution:
  • a Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, VA Medical Center-116A, University & Woodland Aves., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
  • b Clinical Research and Medical Affairs, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752-7010, United States
  • c Pfizer, Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, United States
  • Abstract:

    Background

    Evidence on antipsychotic prescribing decisions is limited. This pilot study quantified factors considered in choosing an antipsychotic and evaluated the influence of metabolic status on treatment decisions.

    Methods

    Prescribing decisions by 4 psychiatrists were examined based on 80 adult patients initiated on antipsychotic medication diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder by DSM-IV criteria, who were admitted to an acute inpatient psychiatric program of an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The primary analysis examined the association between antipsychotic treatment choice and predictions of symptom control and metabolic risk. Secondary analyses included comparison of the chosen and next best treatments in predicted symptom control and metabolic risk, the frequency of reasons cited for drug choice, and the association between treatment choice and patients' baseline metabolic parameters. Mean differences and odds-ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare relationships between treatment choice, ratings of risk and metabolic data.

    Results

    Antipsychotic choice correlated significantly with ratings of predicted symptom control (OR = .92, p = 0.02) and metabolic risk (OR = .88, p = 0.01). Mean differences between the chosen and next best drugs were significant but small in predicted symptom control (F = 2.81, df = 3, 76; p < 0.05) compared with larger differences in anticipated metabolic risk (F = 14.80, df = 3, 76; p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, among 24 identified reasons influencing drug selection, anticipated metabolic risk of chosen antipsychotics was cited less often than efficacy measures. In contrast to psychiatrists' expectations of metabolic risk with selected treatments, we found that patients' actual baseline BMI, fasting glucose, blood pressure, and Framingham risk levels did not necessarily predict antipsychotic treatment choice independent of other factors.

    Conclusion

    In the context of an acute psychiatric hospitalization, pilot data suggest that predictions of symptom control and metabolic risk correlated significantly with antipsychotic choice, but study psychiatrists were willing to assume relative degrees of metabolic risk in favor of effective symptom control. However, prescribing decisions were influenced by numerous patient and treatment factors. These findings support the potential utility of the ATCQ questionnaire in quantifying antipsychotic prescribing decisions. Further validation studies of the ATCQ questionnaire could enhance translation of research findings and application of treatment guidelines.
    Keywords:ATCQ  Antipsychotic Treatment Choice Questionnaire  VAS  visual analogue scale  APA  American Psychiatric Association  ADA  American Diabetes Association  GLM  General Linear Model  SAS  &ldquo  Statistical analysis system&rdquo  software available from SAS Institute Inc    BMI  Body mass index  OR  Odds ratio  SD  Standard deviation  df  Degrees of freedom  DSM  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号