Treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), an objective response to chemotherapy is of limited value and the impact of chemotherapy on survival is modest. Therefore, endpoints evaluating the patients’ subjective benefit such as symptom control (SC), quality of life (QOL) or clinical benefit (CB) have recently been implemented into clinical trials, mostly as secondary endpoints. Chemotherapy offers SC, not only in patients with an objective response, but also in a proportion of patients with disease stabilization. For this purpose, three to four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy are recommended. Interpretation of QOL objectives is limited by several methodologic problems. Studies comparing best supportive care alone with either older platinum-based combinations or single-agent chemotherapy with a new cytotoxic drug usually indicate improved survival and improvement of some component(s) of QOL in the active treatment arm. However, results from studies comparing different chemotherapies are less definitive. Trials comparing single-agent therapy with a new drug with new combinations mostly report no difference in QOL. In addition, most trials comparing new platinum-based combinations with older ones, and trials comparing new platinum-based regimens fail to show any differences in QOL. As a whole, it is far from clear whether combination therapy is superior to modern single-agent therapy, when the patient’s benefit is the primary endpoint. Non-platinum-based doublets, compared with platinum-based doublets, may lead to slightly inferior survival, are not always less toxic, and have not been proven to provide better QOL outcomes. The CB response, originally reported in pancreatic cancer, measures more than SC, but not full QOL. Encouraging experience with this tool was reported in advanced NSCLC. Randomized studies designed to look at some form of patient benefit as a primary endpoint should be a priority in advanced NSCLC.