HLA单倍体相合与全相合外周血造血干细胞移植治疗恶性血液病的疗效比较

目的 观察和比较亲属间人类白细胞抗原(HLA)单倍体相合与全相合外周血造血干细胞移植(PBSCT)治疗恶性血液病的临床疗效.方法 2004年5月至2009年2月,共111例恶性血液病患者进行了异基因PBSCT(allo-PBSCT),其中单倍体相合移植受者51例(单倍体组),同期全相合移植受者60例(全相合组).两组的预处理方案均为清髓性;两组预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)均以经典环孢素A加短程甲氨蝶呤作为基础方案,HLA 1个抗原不合时,加用吗替麦考酚酯,HLA 2～3个抗原不合时,再加用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)及抗CD25单克隆抗体.移植物为经粒细胞集落刺激因子动员的、未进行体外去除T淋巴细胞的外周血造血干细胞(PBSC).结果 111例受者均获得完全、持久供者干细胞植入.单倍体组和全相合组受者中性粒细胞≥0.5×10~9/L的中位时间分别为14 d和12 d,血小板≥20×10~9/L的中位时间分别为15 d和13 d.单倍体组有25例受者发生急性GVHD(aGVHD),其中Ⅰ度20例,Ⅱ度5例;有33例发生慢性GVHD(cGVHD),其中局限型30例,广泛型3例;4年累积发病率为70.4%;无白血病存活40例,3年预期总无白血病存活率(LFS)为74.5%,其中标危型77.3%,高危型68.2%.全相合组有14例发生aGVHD,其中Ⅰ度10例,Ⅱ度2例,Ⅲ度2例;有37例发生cGVHD,其中局限型32例,广泛型5例;4年累积发病率为58.1%.无白血病存活46例,3年预期总LFS为72.1%,其中标危型77.6%,高危型52.7%.单倍体组受者移植后aGVHD发生率高于全相合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但cGVHD、原发病复发率和LFS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 应用清髓性预处理联合多种免疫抑制剂进行非体外去T淋巴细胞的、亲属间HLA单倍体相合与全相合PBSCT均为治疗恶性血液病安全有效的方案.

The clinical outcome of HLA haploidentical vs HLA-matched peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion for malignant hematological diseases

Objective To explore the clinical outcome of HLA haploidentical vs HLA-matcbed peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) without in vitro T-cell depletion for malignant hematological diseases. Methods 111 patients with malignant hematological diseases underwent PBSCT without in vitro T-cell depletion between May 2004 and February 2009, including 51 patients with HLA-haploidentical and 60 patients with HLA-matched. All patients have received myeloablative conditioning regimen. A two-agent based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was used as cyclosporine A and a short course of methotrexate. Mycophenolate mofetile was added for the patients with one locus mismatch. Mycophenolate mofetile, antithymocyte globulin and CD25 monoclonal antibody were added for the patients with 2-3 loci mismatch. The grafts were granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells without in vitro T-cell depletion. Results 111 patients achieved sustained and full donor-type engraftment. The median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count above 0.5×10~9/L was 14 days and that to a platelet count exceeding 20×10~9/L was 15 days in 51 HLA-haploidentical patients, and that was 12 days and 13 days in 60 HLA-matched patients, respectively. In 51 HLA-haploidentical patients, 25 patients developed aGVHD, including 20 cases of grade Ⅰ aGVHD, and 5 cases of grade Ⅱ. Thirty-three patients developed cGVHD with limited in 30 and extensive in 3. The 4-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 70.4 %. The 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 74.5% (77.3 % for standard risk patients and 68.2 % for high risk patients respectively). Seven patients had recurrence. In 60 HLA-matched patients, 14 patients developed aGVHD, including 10 cases of grade Ⅰ, 2 cases of grade Ⅱ and 2 cases of grade Ⅲ. Thirty-seven patients developed cGVHD with limited in 32 and extensive in 5. The 4-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 58.1%. The 3-year probabilities of LFS were 72.1% (77.6 % for standard risk patients and 52.7 % for high risk patients respectively). Ten patients had recurrence. The incidence of aGVHD in HLA-haploidentical cohort was significantly higher than in HLA-matched cohort (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in incidence of cGVHD, incidence of relapse and LFS between HLA-haploidentical and HLA-matched cohorts (P>0.05). Conclusion Haploidentical PBSCT is feasible and safe for malignant hematological diseases to use myeloablative conditioning regimen in combination with intensive immunosuppressants without in vitro T cell depletion.