首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

四种术式治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的对比研究
引用本文:林木本,吴培信,朱法清,陈聪,林国文. 四种术式治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的对比研究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2023, 39(4): 34-38+85. DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.04.007
作者姓名:林木本  吴培信  朱法清  陈聪  林国文
作者单位:廉江市人民医院肝胆外科,广东廉江 524400
基金项目:*湛江市科技计划项目(2020B01096)
摘    要:目的:探讨四种术式在治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石(CCL)中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析160例CCL患者的临床资料。根据术式的不同把患者分为A、B、C、D组,每组40例。A组行开腹胆囊切除术(OC)+胆总管切开胆管镜探查(OCBDE)+T管引流(TTD),B组行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)+胆总管切开胆管镜探查(LCBDE)+TTD,C组行LC+LCBDE+胆管一期缝合(PDC),D组行LC+经胆囊管胆管镜探查(LTCBDE)。统计对比四组的手术相关指标、肝功能指标、应激反应指标、并发症和2年胆管结石累积复发情况。结果:与A组比较,C、D组的手术时间均缩短,B、C、D组的住院时间、腹腔引流时间、恢复正常生活时间缩短,术后3 d空腹血糖、术后3 d血浆皮质醇、术后3 dC反应蛋白、并发症总发生率均明显低,但住院费用均高(P<0.05)。与B组比较,C、D组的手术时间、住院时间、腹腔引流时间、恢复正常生活时间缩短,住院费用、术后3 d空腹血糖、术后3 d血浆皮质醇、术后3 dC反应蛋白均明显低(P<0.05)。A、B、C、D组术后3 d的AST、ALT、总胆红素均明显低于术前(P...

关 键 词:胆囊结石  肝外胆管结石  开腹胆囊切除术  腹腔镜胆囊切除术  胆管镜  对比研究
收稿时间:2022-08-03

Comparative study of four surgical methods in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with extrahepatic bile duct stones
LIN Muben,WU Peixin,ZHU Faqing,CHEN Cong,LIN Guowen. Comparative study of four surgical methods in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with extrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2023, 39(4): 34-38+85. DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.04.007
Authors:LIN Muben  WU Peixin  ZHU Faqing  CHEN Cong  LIN Guowen
Affiliation:Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The People's Hospital of Lianjiang, Lianjiang 524400,China
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the application value of four surgical methods in cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic bile duct stones (CCL). Methods: The clinical data of 160 patients with CCL were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different operation methods, the patients were divided into A, B, C and D groups, and 40 cases in each group. Group A was treated with open cholecystectomy (OC)+open cholecystectomy choledocholithotomy with exploration (OCBDE)+T-tube drainage (TTD). Group B was treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)+laparoscopic cholecystectomy choledocholithotomy with exploration (LCBDE)+TTD. Group C was treated with LC+LCBDE+primary duct closure (PDC). Group D was treated with LC+Laparoscopictranscystic duct common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE). The operation related indexes, liver function indexes, stress response indexes, complications and 2-year cumulative recurrence of bile duct stones in the four groups were compared. Results: Compared with group A, group C and group D had shorter hospitalization time, and group B, group C and group D had shorter abdominal drainage time and recovery time, and significantly lower fasting blood glucose 3 days after operation, plasma cortisol 3 days after operation, C-reactive protein 3 days after operation and total incidence of complications, but longer operation time and higher hospitalization expenses (P<0.05). Compared with group B, group C and group D had shorter operation time, hospitalization time, abdominal drainage time and recovery time, and also had lower hospitalization expenses, fasting blood glucose 3 days after operation, plasma cortisol 3 days after operation, C-reactive protein 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The AST, ALT and total bilirubin of group A, group B, group C, group D 3 days after operation were significantly lower than thsoe before operation (P<0.05). Conclusions: Each of the four methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. In general, LC+LCBDE+PDC and LC+LTCBDE are the best, followed by LC+LCBDE+TTD.
Keywords:Cholecystolithiasis  Extrahepatic bile duct stones  Open cholecystectomy  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy  Choledochoscope  Comparative study  
点击此处可从《包头医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《包头医学院学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号