首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中文版围产期悲伤量表在不良妊娠孕妇中应用的信效度研究
引用本文:徐彬彬.中文版围产期悲伤量表在不良妊娠孕妇中应用的信效度研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2014(19):2323-2326.
作者姓名:徐彬彬
作者单位:x浙江省宁波市妇女儿童医院妇三科,徐彬彬
摘    要:目的:分析中文版围产期悲伤量表( PGS)在不良妊娠孕妇中应用的信效度。方法经过原量表的翻译、回译及文化调适后制订中文版PGS,选取170例不良妊娠孕妇为样本一,进行项目分析和探索性因子分析;另选取110例不良妊娠孕妇为样本二,进行验证性因子分析及信度分析。结果除第5条(我需要与人谈论宝宝)外,其余32个条目与总量表的相关系数均较高( r=0.307~0.659)。探索性因子分析表示,提取的2个因子累积方差贡献率为60.82%;验证性因子分析结果为χ2/df =2.21, RMSEA=0.058,NFI=0.910,GFI=0.900,CFI=0.920。结论中文版围产期悲伤量表信效度良好,适用于对不良妊娠孕妇进行心理评价。

关 键 词:不良妊娠  围产期悲伤量表  信度  效度

Reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Perinatal Grief Scale among abnormal pregnant women
Xu Binbin.Reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Perinatal Grief Scale among abnormal pregnant women[J].Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing,2014(19):2323-2326.
Authors:Xu Binbin
Institution:Xu Binbin. The Third Department of Gynecology, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo 315012, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Perinatal Grief Scale ( PGS) in abnormal pregnant women .Methods After translating the original scale , we applied the back translation and cultural adaptation .Totals of 170 prenatal loss women were surveyed to analyze the item and exploratory factors .Another 110 cases were surveyed to do confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis . Results Except for the fifth item, the remaining 32 items and the correlation coefficient of total scale were higher (r=0.307 -0.659).Two factors were extracted from exploratory factors analysis , accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.82%.The results of confirmatory factor analysis were χ2/df=2.21, RMSEA=0.058, NFI=0.910, GFI=0.900, CFI=0.920.Conclusions The Chinese Version of PGS had good reliability and validity , and it is suitable for psychological assessment of abnormal pregnant women .
Keywords:Abnormal pregnancy  Perinatal grief scale  Reliability  Validity
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号