首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A propensity-score matched analysis of ventral-TAPP vs. laparoscopic IPOM for small and mid-sized ventral hernias. Comparison of perioperative data,surgical outcome and cost-effectiveness
Authors:Megas  I-F  Benzing  C  Winter  A  Raakow  J  Chopra  S  Pratschke  J  Fikatas  P
Institution:1.Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
;
Abstract:Purpose

Laparoscopic techniques have been used and refined in hernia surgery for several years. The aim of this study was to compare an established method such as laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (lap. IPOM) with ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Patch Plasty (ventral-TAPP) in abdominal wall hernia repair.

Methods

Patient-related data of 180 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs between June 2014 and August 2020 were extracted from our prospectively maintained database. Of these patients, 34 underwent ventral-TAPP and 146 lap. IPOM. After excluding hernias with a defect size?>?5 cm and obtaining balanced groups with propensity-score matching, a comparative analysis was performed in terms perioperative data, surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Results

Propensity-score matching suggested 27 patients in each of the two cohorts. The statistical evaluation showed that intake of opiates was significantly higher in the lap. IPOM group compared to ventral-TAPP patients (p?=?0.001). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after lap. IPOM repair was significantly higher at movement (p?=?0.008) and at rest (p?=?0.023). Also, maximum subjective pain during hospital stay was significantly higher in the lap. IPOM group compared to ventral-TAPP patients (p?=?0.004). No hernia recurrence was detected in either group. The material costs of ventral-TAPP procedure (34.37?±?0.47 €) were significantly lower than those of the lap. IPOM group (742.57?±?128.44 € p?=?0.001). The mean operation time was 65.19?±?26.43 min in the lap. IPOM group and 58.65?±?18.43 min in the ventral-TAPP cohort. Additionally, the length of hospital stay in the lap. IPOM cohort was significantly longer (p?=?0.043).

Conclusion

Ventral-TAPP procedures represent an alternative technique to lap. IPOM repair to reduce the risk of complications related to intra-peritoneal position of mesh and fixating devices. In addition, our study showed that postoperative pain level, material costs and hospital stay of the ventral-TAPP cohort are significantly lower compared to lap. IPOM patients.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号