首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Risk of bias reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews
Authors:Lisa Hopp PhD RN FAAN
Affiliation:1. Indiana Center for Evidence Based Nursing Practice: A Joanna Briggs Collaborating Center, Hammond, Indiana, USA;2. College of Nursing, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, Indiana, USA
Abstract:Risk of bias is an inherent quality of primary research and therefore of systematic reviews. This column addresses the Cochrane Collaboration's approach to assessing, risks of bias, the meaning of each, indicators of low, high and uncertain, and ways that risk of bias can be represented in a Cochrane systematic review report. The sources of risk of bias that reviewers evaluate include selection, performance, detection, attrition and reporting bias. Each poses threat to the internal validity of the primary studies and requires the reviewer to judge the level of risk as high, low or unclear. Reviewers need to address how studies of higher risk of bias might impact the pooled effect.
Keywords:Cochrane Collaboration  risk of bias  systematic review
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号