首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

决策参与量表的汉化及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中的信效度检验
引用本文:王丽萍,蔺波,侯铭,祖百法,李萍.决策参与量表的汉化及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中的信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(13):1660-1665.
作者姓名:王丽萍  蔺波  侯铭  祖百法  李萍
作者单位:830001 乌鲁木齐市 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院护理部(王丽萍,侯铭,李萍),放疗科(蔺波);石河子大学医学院护理系(祖百法)
摘    要:目的 汉化决策参与量表,并及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中检验其信效度。 方法 基于Brislin翻译模式对决策参与量表进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试,形成中文版决策参与量表。2021年9月—2022年1月,采用便利抽样法,选取乌鲁木齐市222名颅内肿瘤患者家属进行调查,2周后从中随机抽取30名家属进行重测,检验量表的信效度。 结果 中文版决策参与量表共有10个条目,探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为84.078%。量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.850,折半信度系数为0.819,重测信度系数为0.809。量表的条目内容效度指数为0.833~1.000,全体一致内容效度指数为0.900。验证性因子分析结果显示,卡方自由度比值为2.967、拟合优度指数为0.929、相对拟合指数为0.956、规准适配指数为0.936、非规准适配指数为0.929、增量拟合指数为0.957、近似误差均方根为0.094。 结论 中文版决策参与量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为肿瘤患者家属医疗决策参与的评估工具。

关 键 词:肿瘤  家属  决策参与  信度  效度  护理  
收稿时间:2022-02-10

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Decisional Engagement Scale in family members of patients with intracranial cancers
WANG Liping,LIN Bo,HOU Ming,ZU Baifa,LI Ping.Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Decisional Engagement Scale in family members of patients with intracranial cancers[J].Chinese Journal of Nursing,2022,57(13):1660-1665.
Authors:WANG Liping  LIN Bo  HOU Ming  ZU Baifa  LI Ping
Abstract:Objective To test the reliability and validity of Decisional Engagement Scale for family members of cancer patients(DES-10) in Chinese version. Methods The Chinese version of DES-10 was translated,back translated and modified for cultural adaptation according to Brislin translation model. From September 2021 to January 2022,222 family members of patients with intracranial tumor in Urumqi were selected by convenience sampling,and 30 family members of them were randomly selected to retest after 2 weeks to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of the scale has 10 items. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 84.078%. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.850;the split-half reliability was 0.819;the test-retest reliability was 0.809. The Item-level Content Validity Index was 0.833~1.000;the Scale-level Content Validity Index was 0.900. The confirmatory factor analysis showed:χ2/df=2.967,Goodness Fit Index=0.929,Comparative Fit Index=0.956,Normed Fit Index=0.936,Tucker-Lewis Index=0.929,Incremental Fit Index=0.957,Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.094. Conclusion The Chinese version of DES-10 has good reliability and validity. It could be used as an effective tool to evaluate the medical decisional engagement for family members of cancer patients.
Keywords:Cancer  Family Members  Decisional Engagement  Reliability  Validity  Nursing Care  
点击此处可从《中华护理杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华护理杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号