舍尼通与前列康治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效比较

目的 :比较舍尼通和前列康治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法 :选择门诊确诊的慢性前列腺炎病人 ,随机分为两组 :治疗组 76例 ,年龄 (3 4± 1 3 )a,用舍尼通 1片 ,bid;对照组 64例 ,年龄 (3 3± 1 5 )a,用前列康 4片 (0 5g/片 ) ,tid。疗程均为 3 0d。观察病人主观症状及前列腺液的变化。结果 :舍尼通组治愈率 3 8 2 % ,总有效率 89 5 % ;前列康组治愈率 2 1 9% ,总有效率 76 5 % ,两者总有效率差别有显著意义 (P <0 0 5 )。舍尼通对尿频、下腹部及会阴部疼痛的效果优于前列康。结论 :舍尼通对慢性前列腺炎的总有效率及对尿频、下腹部疼痛、会阴部疼痛的疗效优于前列康。

Cernilton vs conprata pulean in treatment of chronic prostatitis

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficiency of cernilton and conprata pulean in the treatment of chronic prostatitis.METHODS One hundred and forty patients with chronic prostatitis were randomly divided into 2 groups.76 patients of treatment group(age 34a±13a)were treated with cernilton 1 tablet,po,bid,64 patients of control group(age 33a±15a)were treated with conprata pulean 2.0g,po,tid.All patients received 30 days treatment as a course.RESULTS The cure rates and total effective rates were 38.2% and 89.5% in the former group and 21.9% and 76.5% in the later group(P<0.05).Further more,the effects of cernilton on frequent micturition,underbelly ache and perineal ache were better than those of conprata pulean.CONCLUSION Cernilton has a better efficiency than conprata pulean in the treatment of chronic prostatitis.