Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded,randomized trial |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;3. Trauma Unit Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;1. Unit of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute IRCCS, via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy;2. Unit of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Sant''Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | Study objectiveComparison of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).DesignRandomized equivalence trial.SettingUniversity Hospital.PatientsSixty patients undergoing primary THA.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided LPB (n = 30) or SIFIB (n = 30). The local anesthetic agent (40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg/mL) and block adjuvant (4 mg of intravenous dexamethasone) were identical in all subjects. Postoperatively, all patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (morphine) as well as acetaminophen and ketoprofen during 48 h.MeasurementsA blinded investigator recorded morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h as well as time to first morphine request, pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, incidence of adverse events, time to readiness for discharge, and length of hospital stay. The blinded investigator also carried out sensorimotor block assessment at 3, 6 and 24 h using a 10-point sensorimotor composite scale.Main resultsNo intergroup differences were found in terms of cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h (95% CI: −4.0 mg to 2.0 mg) and 48 h (95% CI, −5.0 mg to 2.0 mg) or time to first morphine request. Furthermore, pain scores were similar at all time intervals after 3 h. There were no intergroup differences in terms of composite sensorimotor scores at 3 and 6 h. However, SIFIB lasted longer than lumbar plexus block as evidenced by a higher composite score at 24 h. No intergroup differences were found in terms of complications. Compared with LPB, SIFIB was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge (3 [1-4] vs. 2 [1-3] days; P = 0.042) and length of hospital stay (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4] days; P = 0.048).ConclusionsFor THA, no differences were found between LPB and SIFIB in terms of breakthrough morphine requirement and pain control. However, SIFIB resulted in a longer block and was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge as well as decreased hospital stay. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|