Tele-rehabilitation on independence in activities of daily living after stroke: A Matched Case-Control Study

ObjectivesTo compare independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) in post-acute patients with stroke following tele-rehabilitation and matched in-person controls.Materials and MethodsMatched case-control study. A total of 35 consecutive patients with stroke who followed tele-rehabilitation were compared to 35 historical in-person patients (controls) matched for age, functional independence at admission and time since injury to rehabilitation admission (<60 days). The tele-rehabilitation group was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n=990). Independence in ADLs was assessed using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Barthel Index (BI). We formally compared FIM and BI gains calculated as discharge score - admission scores, efficiency measured as gains / length of stay and effectiveness defined as (discharge score-admission score)/ (maximum score-admission score). We analyzed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FIM and BI.ResultsThe groups showed no significant differences in type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), location, severity, age at injury, length of stay, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, aphasia, neglect, affected side of the body, dominance or educational level. The groups showed no significant differences in gains, efficiency nor effectiveness either using FIM or Barthel Index.We identified significant differences in two specific BI items (feeding and transfer) in favor of the in-person group. No differences were observed in the proportion of patients who achieved MCID.ConclusionsNo significant differences were seen between total ADL scores for tele-rehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation. Future research studies should analyze a combined rehabilitation approach that utilizes both models.