Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization with Liquid Embolic Agents for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PurposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization with liquid embolic agents and the outcomes of patients following this procedure.Materials and MethodsA review of the literature was conducted to identify studies investigating the efficacy and safety of MMA embolization with liquid embolic agents in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. The keywords “liquid embolic agent,” “middle meningeal artery,” “cSDH,” and “embolization” as well as their synonyms were used to build up the search strategy. The R statistical software and random-effects model were used for analysis. Heterogeneity was reported as I², and publication bias was calculated using the Egger test.ResultsOf 628 articles retrieved, 14 studies were eligible to be included in this study. Data of 276 patients were analyzed. n-Butyl cyanoacrylate and ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer were the most commonly used embolic agents. This study revealed a pooled mortality rate of 0% (95% confidence interval CI], 0.00%–100%), recurrence and failure rate of 3% (95% CI, 1%–10%), reoperation/reintervention rate of 4% (95% CI, 2%–12%), rate of size decrease of 94% (95% CI, 79%–98%), technical success rate of 100% (95% CI, 76%–100%), and adverse event rate of 1% (95% CI, 0.00%–4%).ConclusionsWith low mortality, recurrence, reoperation, and adverse event rates and a remarkable decrease in the size of hematomas, MMA embolization with liquid embolic agents may be considered a safe and effective treatment option in patients in whom surgical intervention has previously failed and as an alternative to conventional treatments.