How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Dept. of Cognitive Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;3. Dept. of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;4. Dept. of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;1. Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States;2. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | Response inhibition is an essential control function necessary to adapt one's behavior. This key cognitive capacity is assumed to be dependent on the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. It is unresolved whether varying inhibitory demands engage different control mechanisms or whether a single motor inhibitory mechanism is involved in any situation. We addressed this question by comparing electrophysiological activity in conditions that require stopping a response to conditions that require switching to an alternate response. Analyses of electrophysiological data obtained from stop-signal tasks are complicated by overlapping stimulus-related activity that is distributed over frontal and parietal cortical recording sites. Here, we applied Laplacian transformation and independent component analysis (ICA) to overcome these difficulties. Participants were faster in switching compared to stopping a response, but we did not observe differences in neural activity between these conditions. Both stop- and change-trials Laplacian transformed ERPs revealed a comparable bilateral parieto-occipital negativity around 180 ms and a frontocentral negativity around 220 ms. ICA results suggested an inhibition-related frontocentral component which was characterized by a negativity around 200 ms with a likely source in anterior cingulate cortex. The data provide support for the importance of posterior mediofrontal areas in inhibitory response control and are consistent with a common neural pathway underlying stopping and changing of a motor response. The methodological approach proved useful to distinguish frontal and parietal sources despite similar timing and the ICA approach allowed assessment of single-trial data with respect to behavioral data. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
