综合心理行为干预前后官兵野外机动能力和生理功能变化

目的研究综合心理行为干预对官兵野外机动能力以及生理机能的影响。方法以某部156名官兵为研究对象,随机分为试验组(78名)和对照组(78名)。试验组给予综合心理行为干预4周,对照组仅进行常规军事训练。干预前后分别考核两组的野外地图使用和短距离越野两项野外机动能力项目,并测量心率、血压、肺活量和体重等生理指标。结果组内比较,试验组干预后标定地图用时(7.87±3.64)s、确定站立点用时(16.45±4.45)s、确定目标点用时(10.82±5.89)s、选择路线用时(25.38±8.53)s、判读距离用时(11.22±5.21)s,短距离越野能力的山林地用时(144.38±8.56)s、开阔地用时(128.05±11.45)s、小路用时(101.50±9.58)s、上坡用时(282.45±14.76)s、下坡用时(172.02±9.56)s,生理指标的心率(132.02±10.34)次/min、收缩压(138.78±9.83)mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa)等指标值,分别低于干预前(P<0.05或0.01);对照组干预后的地图使用能力的标定地图用时(9.24±3.64)s和短距离越野能力的山林地用时(153.53±10.82)s的指标值,分别低于干预前(P均<0.05)。组间比较,干预前两组各野外机动能力考核指标和生理指标之间无显著性差异(P>0.05);干预后两组地图使用能力的标定地图、确定站立点、确定目标点、选择路线、判读距离,短距离越野能力的山林地、小路、上坡、下坡,生理指标的心率、收缩压等指标间均有显著性差异(P<0.05或0.01)。结论综合心理行为干预可以提高官兵的野外机动能力,并改善生理功能。

Impact of the comprehensive intervention of psychology & behaviour on the field mobile ability and physiological functions of army men: Changes between pre-and post-intervention

Objective To explore the impact of the comprehensive intervention of psychology & behaviour on the field mobile ability and physiological functions of army men. Methods Hundred fifty-six army men were divided into two groups, namely study group and control group. The study group received the comprehensive intervention for 4 weeks. The resulted effects were assessed by detecting heart rate, blood pressure, vital capacity, avoirdupois, and the ability test of using-map and cross-country operation. Results After the intervention in the study group heart rate was (132.02±10.34)beats/min; systolic blood pressure (138.78±9.83)mmHg, calibration of map, (7.87 ±3.64)seconds; determination of the stand-point, (16.45 ±4.45)seconds; determination of the target points, (10.82±5.89)seconds; selection of the line, (25.38±8.53)seconds; reading distance, (11.22±5.21)seconds; the ability of short-distance cross-country mountain land, (144.38 ±8.56)seconds; open land, (128.05 ±11.45)seconds; paths, (101.50 ±9.58)seconds; uphill, (282.45 ±14.76) seconds; Downhill, (172.02 ±9.56)seconds; these indexes were all respectively lower than before the intervention (P<0.05 or 0.01). After the intervention the control group showed lower capacity of the calibration of map (9.24±3.64)seconds] and the short distance cross-country in mountain land (153.53±10.82)seconds] respectively than that before the intervention (P<0.05). There were significantly differences between both groups on the most items of using-map, cross-country training, and the physiological function after the combined intervention(P<0.01 or 0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive psychological & behavioral intervention can effectively improve the field mobile ability and physiological functions of army men.