首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30
Authors:N.W.?Scott  P.M.?Fayers  N.K.?Aaronson  A.?Bottomley  A.?de?Graeff  M.?Groenvold  M.?Koller  M.A.?Petersen  M.A.G.?Sprangers
Affiliation:(1) Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK;(2) Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;(3) Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands;(4) Quality of Life Unit, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Brussels, Belgium;(5) Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands;(6) Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark;(7) Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;(8) Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;(9) Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract:Introduction The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 is a widely used health-related quality of life instrument. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether there are international differences in response to the questionnaire that can be explained by cultural factors. Methods Analyses involved a database of 106 separate studies including data from over 28,000 respondents. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses using logistic regression were conducted for each item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 with respect to cultural/geographic group. Results were qualitatively compared with previously reported DIF analyses by translation to explore whether the source of the DIF was more likely to be linguistic or cultural in nature. Results Although most response patterns were similar, there were a number of international differences in how the questionnaire was answered. The largest variations were found in the results for Eastern Europe and East Asia. Results for the UK, the US and Australia tended to be similar. Many of the European results followed patterns that were more clearly explained when grouped by translation than when grouped by geographical region. Discussion Our results suggest that, in general, the EORTC QLQ-C30 is suitable for use in a wide variety of countries and settings. Some response variations that have the potential to affect the results of international studies were identified, but it was not always clear whether the source of the variation was primarily linguistic or cultural.
Keywords:Cancer  Cross-cultural research  Differential item functioning  EORTC QLQ-C30  Quality of life
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号