首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Intensifying approaches to address clinical inertia among cardiovascular disease risk factors: A narrative review
Affiliation:1. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Attn: HSR&D COIN (558/152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA;2. Duke University School of Nursing, Box 3322 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA;3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB #7400, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599?7400, USA;4. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA;5. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1200, Nashville, TN 37203, USA;6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA;7. Cascades East Family Medicine Residency, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA;8. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 102508, Durham, NC 27710, USA;1. School of Communication, Media and Journalism, Kean University, Union, NJ, USA;2. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;3. College of Communication, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA;4. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;5. Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA;7. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA;8. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA;9. William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Madison, WI, USA;10. School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;11. Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;1. Institute for Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany;2. Institute or Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Germany;3. Institute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Germany;1. Student Research Committee, Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran;2. Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Medical University Campus, Haft Bagh Highway, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran;3. School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran;4. Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran
Abstract:ObjectiveClinical inertia, the absence of treatment initiation or intensification for patients not achieving evidence-based therapeutic goals, is a primary contributor to poor clinical outcomes. Effectively combating clinical inertia requires coordinated action on the part of multiple representatives including patients, clinicians, health systems, and the pharmaceutical industry. Despite intervention attempts by these representatives, barriers to overcoming clinical inertia in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor control remain.MethodsWe conducted a narrative literature review to identify individual-level and multifactorial interventions that have been successful in addressing clinical inertia.ResultsEffective interventions included dynamic forms of patient and clinician education, monitoring of real-time patient data to facilitate shared decision-making, or a combination of these approaches. Based on findings, we describe three possible multi-level approaches to counter clinical inertia – a collaborative approach to clinician training, use of a population health manager, and use of electronic monitoring and reminder devices.ConclusionTo reduce clinical inertia and achieve optimal CVD risk factor control, interventions should consider the role of multiple representatives, be feasible for implementation in healthcare systems, and be flexible for an individual patient’s adherence needs.Practice ImplicationsRepresentatives (e.g., patients, clinicians, health systems, and the pharmaceutical industry) could consider approaches to identify and monitor non-adherence to address clinical inertia.
Keywords:Clinical inertia  Disease management  Medication adherence  Treatment outcome  Diabetes mellitus  Cardiovascular disease  CVD"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  key0040"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  Cardiovascular Disease  CME"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  key0050"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  Continuing Medical Education  PHM"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  key0060"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  Population Health Manager  EHR"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  key0070"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  Electronic Health Record  EMD"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  key0080"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  Electronic Monitoring Device
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号