The potential role of modern US in the follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate a standardized ultrasonography (US) algorithm for the visualization of pathologic para-aortic tissue in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with lumbar RPF of typical extent, as determined by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, were included. Examinations were conducted using standardized abdominal US with axial sections obtained at the levels of the renal arteries, aortic bifurcation, and both common iliac arteries. Imaging of each section was acquired with fundamental B-mode (US) and tissue harmonic imaging, respectively. In addition, we examined RPF visualized using extended field-of-view US.

RESULTS

Tissue harmonic imaging adequately visualized RPF of typical extent in 33 patients (94.2%). Excellent and good visualization with mild artifacts were achieved in 25 (71.4%) and six (17.1%) patients, respectively. When RPF spread along the iliac arteries, excellent visualization was achieved in 38.7% for the left side and 34.5% for the right side. There were significantly fewer diagnostic examinations for the right iliac (27.6%) than for the left one (9.7%) (P = 0.016). Overall, harmonic imaging achieved significantly better visualization than fundamental B-Mode (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We described the first systematic evaluation of RPF visualization by modern US techniques. The best imaging quality was found in the typical RPF location, at the level of the aortic bifurcation. These results advocate for the presented US algorithm as an efficient follow-up alternative to cross-sectional imaging in RPF patients.Chronic periaortitis or retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare fibrosing disease that affects para-aortic tissues (1–3). It typically presents as a proliferating lumbar process surrounding the ureters and retroperitoneal vascular structures (Fig. 1) (2, 4). Sporadic, atypical manifestations in pelvic and mesenteric regions are also possible (5).Open in a separate windowFigure 1. a–c.Typical extent of the retroperitoneal fibrosis surrounding the infrarenal aorta (a). Spreading of the fibrosis to the renal arteries and along the common iliac arteries (b). Standardized US examination with four transverse sections (c). AO, aorta; AIC, common iliac artery; RA, renal artery; RPF, retroperitoneal fibrosis.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows precise evaluation of the extent and complications (6). RPF presents as hypointense (often isointense to striated muscle) plaques in native T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images with significant gadolinium contrast enhancement of active and untreated retroperitoneal fibrosis (7–9).Ultrasonography (US) is primarily used in patients with RPF for a rapid and practical diagnosis of consecutive hydronephrosis (6). RPF presents as a smooth-bordered mass with either an echo-poor or echo-free signal (10, 11). Two studies in the 1980s indicated that US revealed only a poor overall sensitivity in the detection of RPF (12, 13). Feinstein et al. (14) reported that only 25% of affected patients with computed tomography (CT)-mediated diagnosis of RPF showed corresponding ultrasonographic abnormalities. Since that time the quality of US scanners has improved dramatically, and modern techniques, such as tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and extended field-of-view US, have significant advantages for routine clinical diagnosis (15–17). Today, US has established itself as an effective and cost-efficient imaging method for the screening and follow-up of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (18, 19). US, however, is not used routinely for RPF follow-up, nor has a systematic evaluation of modern ultrasonographic methods been available to date.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential role of modern ultrasonographic techniques for the visualization of fibrous tissue in patients with prediagnosed RPF.