Optimal reconstruction interval in dual source CT coronary angiography: a single-center experience in 285 patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the visibility of coronary arteries and bypass-grafts in patients who underwent dual source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography without heart rate (HR) control and to determine optimal intervals for image reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 285 consecutive cases who underwent coronary (n=255) and bypass-graft (n=30) DSCT angiography at our institution were identified retrospectively. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Ten datasets in 10% increments were reconstructed in all patients. On each dataset, the visibility of coronary arteries was evaluated using the 15-segment American Heart Association classification by two radiologists in consensus.

RESULTS

Mean HR was 76±16.3 bpm, (range, 46–127 bpm). All coronary segments could be visualized in 277 patients (97.19%). On a segment-basis, 4265 of 4275 (99.77%) coronary artery segments were visible. All segments of 56 bypass-grafts in 30 patients were visible (100%). Total mean segment visibility scores of all coronary arteries were highest at 70%, 40%, and 30% intervals for all HRs. The optimal reconstruction intervals to visualize the segments of all three coronary arteries in descending order were 70%, 60%, 80%, and 30% intervals in patients with a mean HR <70 bpm; 40%, 70%, and 30% intervals in patients with a mean HR 70–100 bpm; and 40%, 50%, and 30% in patients with a mean HR >100 bpm.

CONCLUSION

Without beta-blocker administration, DSCT coronary angiography offers excellent visibility of vascular segments using both end-systolic and mid-late diastolic reconstructions at HRs up to 100 bpm, and only end-systolic reconstructions at HRs over 100 bpm.Improvements in computed tomography (CT) scanning technology throughout the last decade have resulted in widespread acceptance of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) coronary angiography as a reliable modality for noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries (1). Having a high negative predictive value, MDCT coronary angiography is considered particularly beneficial in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD) by reliably excluding coronary artery stenosis and therefore, preventing unnecessary invasive angiography (2, 3).Small dimensions and continuous rapid motions of coronary arteries make their visualization by CT challenging. Thus, excellent spatial and temporal resolution is required for adequate imaging of coronary arteries. Initial reports using a 4-detector row MDCT were promising in selected patients with low heart rates (HRs) (4–6); however, image quality was not sufficient for assessment in up to 29% of the coronary segments. With the introduction of 16- and 64-row MDCT, major improvements of image quality were achieved, with adequate visualization of up to 97% of coronary segments (7–9). Since, image quality deteriorates with increasing HRs even with 64-slice MDCT scanners (10, 11), it has been common in clinical practice to use HR-modulating beta-blockers to achieve better diagnostic quality. In 2005, dual source CT (DSCT) system equipped with two sets of X-ray tubes and corresponding detectors mounted onto the gantry with an angular offset of 90° was introduced (12). Using half-scan reconstruction algorithms, this system provides high temporal resolution (83 milliseconds ms]) that corresponds to a quarter gantry rotation time. Preliminary studies without use of beta-blocker premedication have shown that DSCT coronary angiography provides good image quality of coronary arteries even at a relatively high HR (13, 14). Subsequent studies with relatively small patient populations confirmed these findings with diagnostic image quality in 97.8% of coronary artery segments (15, 16).Achievement of good image quality with DSCT coronary angiography is highly dependent upon selecting the optimal reconstruction interval for evaluation. Previous publications indicate a relationship between optimal reconstruction window and HR with mid- to end-diastolic reconstructions providing better image quality at low HRs, whereas at faster HRs, end-systolic reconstructions will often provide the dataset with the least motion artifact (17–19). However, some of these prior studies were based on relatively small patient samples, and in some, the entire R-R interval was not evaluated. Detection of optimal reconstruction interval is also important for the purpose of radiation dose reduction. Since DSCT scanners are equipped with electrocardiogram (ECG)-based tube current modulation, the width and timing of the ECG pulsing window, during which the full tube current is given, can be manually selected by the operator with the tube current outside the pulsing window decreased to 20% or 4% of the nominal tube current and thus, significantly reducing the radiation dose up to 40% (20).We aimed to evaluate the visibility of coronary arteries and bypass-grafts in patients who underwent DSCT angiography without HR control and to determine optimal intervals for image reconstruction.