首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

痔上黏膜环切钉合术与Ligasure血管闭合术治疗痔的疗效比较
引用本文:陈双,赖东明,杨斌,章立,周太成,陈国星. 痔上黏膜环切钉合术与Ligasure血管闭合术治疗痔的疗效比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2007, 10(4): 342-345
作者姓名:陈双  赖东明  杨斌  章立  周太成  陈国星
作者单位:510120,广州,中山大学附属第二医院胃肠外科
摘    要:目的探讨痔上黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)与用Ligasure血管闭合技术(LT)治疗痔的临床疗效。方法将86例Ⅲ度痔患者在知情同意后,随机分为PPH组(44例)和LT组(42例)。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间和术后疗效及出血、疼痛及费用。结果(1)手术时间:LT组为(12.0±4.1)min;PPH组为(19.0±6.4)min,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(2)疼痛:术后24h视觉模拟疼痛(VAS)评分PPH组和LT组分别为3.1(2.6)和5.4(3.8),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(3)费用:LT组为(4838±301)元,PPH组为(7796±492)元,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(4)并发症:PPH组术后出血(超过50ml)4例,复发1例;LT组无术后出血(1次量〉50ml)和复发。(5)满意度调查:术后6个月时,患者对手术疼痛、排便和总体满意度进行自我评分,PPH组分别为95.0%、100%和100%,LT组则分别为87.2%、97.4%和97.4%;两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论LT和PPH都是治疗痔的有效方法。LT与PPH比较,具有术中及术后几乎不出血、手术时间更短和费用更低的优点。但术后疼痛较为明显。

关 键 词:痔 痔上黏膜环切钉合术 Ligasure血管闭合技术
修稿时间:2006-08-02

Therapeutic comparison between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ligasure technique for hemorrhoids
CHEN Shuang,LAI Dong-ming,YANG Bin,ZHANG Li,ZHOU Tai-cheng,CHEN Guo-xing. Therapeutic comparison between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ligasure technique for hemorrhoids[J]. Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2007, 10(4): 342-345
Authors:CHEN Shuang  LAI Dong-ming  YANG Bin  ZHANG Li  ZHOU Tai-cheng  CHEN Guo-xing
Affiliation:Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the clinical effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Ligasure technique (LT) for the treatment of severe hemorrhoids. METHODS: Patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids were randomly divided into two groups treated with PPH (n=44) and LT (n=42). The outcomes were evaluated postoperatively (i.e., operation time, length of hospital stay, pain intensity scoring, relapse of prolapse, bleeding and cost). RESULTS: (1)The average operating time for patients treated by LT was (12.0+/- 4.1) min, while for those by PPH was(19.0+/- 6.4)min (P < 0.05). (2)The average scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) for PPH and LT patients were 3.1 points (2 approximately 6) and 5.4 points (3~8) respectively(P < 0.05). (3)The average costs for LT group and PPH group were (4838+/- 301) yuan and (7796+/- 492) yuan respectively (P < 0.05). (4)In PPH group, 4 patients were complicated with hemorrhage (over 50 ml) and 1 patients with relapse, while there were no complications occurred in LT group. (5)Six months after operation, the self scores of postoperative pain,defecation and total satisfaction were 95.0%, 100% and 100% in PPH group, and 87.2%, 97.4% and 97.4% in LT group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PPH, LT has the advantages of shorter operation time, less hemorrhage and expense, but more postoperative pain. Both LT and PPH are effective procedures for severe hemorrhoids.
Keywords:Hemorrhoids   Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids   Ligasure technique
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号