首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Effektivität und Toxizität einer Re-Bestrahlung (Re-RT) bei metastatisch bedingter Rückenmarkkompression (MBRK)
Authors:Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dirk Rades  Lukas J. A. Stalpers  Theo Veninga  Rainer Schulte  Peter J. Hoskin  Winfried Alberti
Affiliation:1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universit?tsklinikum, Hamburg Eppendorf
6. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universit?tsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistra?e 52, 20246, Hamburg
2. Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Niederlande
3. Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Bernard Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, Niederlande
4. Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universit?t, Lübeck
5. Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Gro?britannien
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation myelopathy is a serious late toxicity after radiotherapy (RT) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). The risk of myelopathy depends on the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). Many radiation oncologists are concerned about spinal Re-RT, because it may result in a high cumulative EQD2. This study investigates effectiveness and feasibility of Re-RT for in-field recurrence of MSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 74 patients, irradiated between 01/1995 and 12/2003 for MSCC, were reirradiated for in-field recurrence of MSCC (Table 1). Primary RT was performed with 1 x 8 Gy (n = 34), 5 x 4 Gy (n = 28), 10 x 3 Gy (n = 4), 15 x 2.5 Gy (n = 4), or 20 x 2 Gy (n = 4). Recurrence occurred after median 6 months (2-40 months). Re-RT was performed with 1 x 8 Gy (n = 35), 5 x 3 Gy (n = 16), 5 x 4 Gy (n = 13), 10 x 2 Gy (n = 4), 12 x 2 Gy (n = 3), or 17 x 1.8 Gy (n = 3). Cumulative EQD2 (alpha/beta = 2 Gy) was 39-40 Gy (n = 21), 49-50 Gy (n = 41), 56-60 Gy (n = 6), or > 60 Gy (n = 6). Follow-up after Re-RT was median 9 months (2-52 months). RESULTS: Re-RT led to an improvement of motor function in 29/74 patients (39%; Figures 1 to 3). On multivariate analysis, outcome was significantly influenced by type of primary tumor (p = 0.013) and by the time of developing motor deficits before Re-RT (p = 0.037), but not by radiation schedule (p = 0.560), by ambulatory status before Re-RT (p = 0.471), by cumulative EQD2 (p = 0.795), nor by the interval between primary RT and Re-RT (p = 0.420; Table 2). Radiation myelopathy was not observed in the whole series. CONCLUSION: Re-RT is an effective treatment for an in-field recurrence of MSCC. After a cumulative EQD2 < or = 50 Gy, radiation myelopathy appears unlikely.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号