首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

3种配准方式下肺癌图像引导放射治疗摆位误差的比较
引用本文:李云,王凡. 3种配准方式下肺癌图像引导放射治疗摆位误差的比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2019, 40(6): 603-605
作者姓名:李云  王凡
作者单位:230022,合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤放疗科;230022,合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤放疗科
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:81201743)
摘    要:目的研究滑轨CT不同配准方式对肺癌大分割调强放疗摆位误差的影响。方法选取2016年10月至2017年10月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院放疗科就诊的肺癌患者24例,每周行滑轨CT扫描所得图像与原计划图像行灰度、骨性、手动3种模式在线配准,得出X、Y、Z轴3个方向平移误差,并进行统计分析。结果灰度配准、骨性配准和手动配准方式测量的X、Y、Z轴摆位误差分别为(0. 21±0. 16)、(0. 29±0. 15)、(0. 37±0. 22) cm,(0. 27±0. 16)、(0. 35±0. 25)、(0. 29±0. 19) cm,(0. 18±0. 12)、(0. 28±0. 16)、(0. 23±0. 14) cm,结果显示Y轴平移误差最大,其次为X轴,Z轴最小,且3组数据的差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。其中灰度模式在X、Y、Z轴上平移误差较骨性模式均缩小,灰度模式在X、Z轴上平移误差较手动模式有所缩小,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论肺癌患者行图像引导大分割调强放疗时,应用滑轨CT中的灰度模式可缩小摆位误差。

关 键 词:滑轨CT  配准方式  图像引导大分割调强放疗  摆位误差
收稿时间:2018-09-28

Comparison of IGRT set-up errors in lung cancer with three registration models
LI Yun and WANG Fan. Comparison of IGRT set-up errors in lung cancer with three registration models[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2019, 40(6): 603-605
Authors:LI Yun and WANG Fan
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China and Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the impacts of different CT-on-Rail matching models on set-up errors in hypofraction radiotherapy dealing with lung cancer. Methods Twenty-four patients were randomly selected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University during Oct.2016 to Oct.2017.Each patient received CT-on-rail scan each week,and obtained images undergone online registrations with original ones in three different aspects,including grey-scale,bone and manual models.The translation deviations in X,Yand Z-axes were collected and analyzed statistically.Results The X, Y and Z axes set-up errors measured by gray-scale, bone and manual models were (0.21±0.16), (0.29±0.15), (0.37±0.22) cm respectively,(0.27±0.16), (0.35±0.25), (0.29±0.19) cm respectively, and (0.18±0.12), (0.28±0.16), (0.23±0.14)cm respectively. The results showed that the Y-axis set-up error was the largest, followed by the X-axis. The Z axis was the smallest, and the difference between three groups of data was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with bone model,the translation errors of grey-scale model on X,Y,Z axes were significantly reduced(P<0.05).Meanwhile,grey-scale model presented lower translation deviations on X and Z axes than manual model,which was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusions CT-on-rail could reduce set-up errors in lung cancer patients treated with IGIMHR,and the grey-scale model would be of top priority.
Keywords:CT-on-rail  Registration model  Image guided intensity modulated hypofractionated radiotherapy  Set-up errors
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《安徽医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《安徽医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号