| 多支血管病变急性心梗直接冠状动脉成形术后住院期间疗效观察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨伟,陈万春,金惠根,尚孝堂,刘宗军,汪蔚青,施佳,王东毅,江蓓湖,欧少君.多支血管病变急性心梗直接冠状动脉成形术后住院期间疗效观察[J].介入放射学杂志,2003(Z1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨伟 陈万春 金惠根 尚孝堂 刘宗军 汪蔚青 施佳 王东毅 江蓓湖 欧少君 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海市普陀区中心医院心脏科
200062(杨伟，陈万春，金惠根，尚孝堂，刘宗军，汪蔚青，施佳，王东毅，江蓓湖)，上海市普陀区中心医院心脏科 200062(欧少君) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 比较单支与多支血管病变急性心肌梗死 (AMI)患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入 (PCI)后住院期间心功能和心脏事件的发生率。方法 115例AMI患者 ,均于发病后 12h内直接PCI和支架术。根据急诊冠状动脉造影结果将患者分为单支血管病变组 (甲组 ) 6 6例和多支血管病变组 (乙组 ) 4 9例。询问有无梗死前心绞痛史 ,发病后 10d作二维心动超声检查 ,出院前记录心脏事件。结果 甲组 12例出现梗死前心绞痛 (12 / 6 6 ) ,乙组 18例 (18/ 4 9) ,P <0 .0 1;甲组PCI后平均左心射血分数为 (6 3.0 0±6 .76 ) % ,乙组为 (6 2 .18± 8.5 2 ) % ,P >0 .0 5 ;术后甲组心功能衰竭发生 6 / 6 6 ,乙组为 4 / 4 9,P >0 .0 5 ;甲组心绞痛发生 3/ 6 6 ,乙组为 2 / 4 9,P >0 .0 5 ;甲组恶性心律失常发生 2 / 6 6 ,乙组为 3/ 4 9,P >0 .0 5 ;甲组心源性死亡发生 2 / 6 6 ,乙组为 0 ,P >0 .0 5 ;甲组复合终点事件为 13/ 6 6 ,乙组为 9/ 4 9,P >0 .0 5 ,均无显著统计学差异。结论 无论单支或多支血管病变AMI后对梗死相关动脉行直接PCI均同样有效
|
| 关 键 词： | 急性心肌梗死 多支血管 靶血管 直接PCI |
Comparison of the effect of primary percutanuous cononary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel and one vessel disease |
| |
| YANG Wei,CHEN Wanchun,JIN Huigen,et al..Comparison of the effect of primary percutanuous cononary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel and one vessel disease[J].Journal of Interventional Radiology,2003(Z1). |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Wei CHEN Wanchun JIN Huigen |
| |
| Institution: | YANG Wei,CHEN Wanchun,JIN Huigen,et al. Shanghai Putuo District Centre Hospital,Shanghai 200062,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the effect of primary percutanuous coronary intervention (PCI) in multivessel and one vessel involvement in AMI patient during hospital stay, using LVEF and cardiac events as end point. Methods : One hundred and fifteen cases of AMI were dichotomized into one vessel group (66 group A) and multivessel group (49 group B). Preinfarction angina was noted. Two-dimensional echocardiograms were carried out 10 days after onset of symptoms. Adverse cardiac events were recorded before discharge. Results: Twelve patients in group A exhibited preinfarction angina (12/66); in group B 18 cases displayed the same(18/49), P< 0.01. In group A ,mean LVEF was 63.00+6.76%,which in group B, it was 62.18+8.52%, P >0.05;Heart failure occurred in 6 cases in group A (6/66), and 4 in group B (4/49); P >0.05;Three cases had angina in group A (3/66); in group B, only 2 cases (2/49), P >0.05. Two patients developed malignant ventricular arrhythmias in group A (2/66) ; in group B , 3 cases (3/49), P > 0.05 . As far as cardiogenic shock was concerned it was 2 in group A , none in group B, P >0.025. The compound end points was 13/66 in group A and 9/49 in group B , P >0.05, all statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Primary PCI was equally effective for the treatment of one vessel and multivessel AMI patients. |
| |
| Keywords: | AMI multivessel Targetvessel Primary PCI |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
