首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


First-in-Man Experience with a Novel Catheter-Based Renal Denervation System of Ultrasonic Ablation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Authors:Gil Chernin  Iris Szwarcfiter  Dierk Scheinert  Erwin Blessing  Nicolas Diehm  Jo Dens  Antony Walton  Stefan Verheye  Sharad Shetty  Michael Jonas
Institution:1. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kaplan Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Pasternak St. POB1, Rehovot 76100, Israel;2. Department of Cardiology, Kaplan Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Pasternak St. POB1, Rehovot 76100, Israel;3. Cardiosonic Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel;4. Division of Interventional Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany;5. Department of Internal Medicine, SRH Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Karlsbad, Germany;6. Angiology Department, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland;g. Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium;h. Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;i. ZNA Middelheim, Antwerpen, Belgium;j. Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia;k. Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia;l. Department of Cardiology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Abstract:

Purpose

To report results of renal denervation (RDN) with the first catheter-based, non–balloon occlusion ultrasonic system in patients with resistant hypertension.

Materials and Methods

In a multicenter, single-arm trial, 39 patients with resistant hypertension (defined as uncontrolled hypertension while taking ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications) were treated. The cohort consisted of 4 groups: severe resistant hypertension (office systolic blood pressure OSBP] ≥ 160 mm Hg) treated with a unidirectional catheter (group 1; n = 14); severe resistant hypertension treated with a multidirectional catheter (group 2; n = 18); moderate resistant hypertension (OSBP 140–159 mm Hg) treated with a multidirectional catheter (group 3; n = 5); and recurrent severe resistant hypertension, after an initial response to RF RDN (group 4; n = 2). Blood pressure monitoring was performed for 6 months.

Results

Severe adverse events were not noted immediately after the procedure or during follow-up. Treatment time was longer with unidirectional than with multidirectional catheters (36.7 min ± 9.6 vs 11.9 min ± 5.8; P < .001). Mean reductions in office blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) at 1, 3, and 6 months were ?26.1/?9.6 mm Hg, ?28.0/?9.9 mm Hg, and ?30.6/?14.1 mm Hg (P < .01 for all). Per-group analysis showed significant OSBP reduction for groups 1 and 2. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension had a significantly smaller reduction in OSBP after 6 months compared with patients with combined systolic/diastolic hypertension (?16.2 mm Hg ± 18.5 vs ?9.9 mm Hg ± 33.4; P < .005).

Conclusions

Use of the RDN system was feasible and safe in this phase I study. Significant blood pressure reductions were observed over 6 months, although less in patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
Keywords:ABPM  ambulatory blood pressure monitoring  ADBP  ambulatory diastolic blood pressure  ASBP  ambulatory systolic blood pressure  CH  combined systolic/diastolic hypertension  eGFR  estimated glomerular filtration rate  ISH  isolated systolic hypertension  ODBP  office diastolic blood pressure  OSBP  office systolic blood pressure  RDN  renal denervation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号