全下肢动脉血管造影技术的临床应用探讨

目的比较血管造影跟踪法(bolus chasing angiography,BCA)与传统法(static digital subtraction angiography,DSA)的技术特点。方法回顾性分析了我院61例全下肢动脉血管造影患者的造影技术参数,其中31例采用BCA、30例采用DSA血管造影技术。分别对完成造影时间、对比剂用量、图像质量、患者吸收辐射剂量(dose-area product,DAP)进行对照分析。结果2种造影技术对比显示:DSA的图像质量在显示胫腓血管上优于BCA,但是DAP值高,对比剂用量多以及检查时间长。经统计学处理,二者差异均具有显著性(P<0.00)。结论BCA与DSA相比具有造影时间短,对比剂量用量少,DAP低的特点,DSA局部观察血管情况较细致。因此,先行BCA筛查,然后针对病变加做局部DSA。

Clinical Application of Digital Subtraction Angiography Technique in Lower Extremity Arteries

Objective To compare the techniques of bolus chasing angiography(BCA)and static digital subtraction angiography(DSA).Methods The parameters of BCA and DSA including time of examination,dose of contrast medium,image quality and dose-area product(DAP)were comparatively analysed in 61 patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic peripheral disease.Results DSA in comparison with BCA was of better image quality in showing fibiofibular vessel,but DAP value was high,more contrast medium dose and examined time was long.There was statistically significant difference between both DSA and BCA(P<0.00).Conclusion BCA in comparison with DSA is of short examined time,less contrast medium and low DAP,so BCA can be used as the first choice and complement of DSA for detecting lower extremity arterious diseases.