无血缘关系供者外周血干细胞移植和骨髓移植治疗白血病的比较

目的比较无血缘关系供者外周血干细胞移植和骨髓移植在造血重建、T 细胞重建、感染、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)及疗效等的差异。方法 53例白血病患者中,21例接受无血缘关系供者外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT 组),32例接受无血缘关系供者骨髓移植(BMT 组)。统计分析二者移植后白细胞和血小板重建时间、T 细胞重建、感染率、GVHD、白血病复发、无病生存(DFS)情况。结果PBSCT 组和 BMT 组移植后白细胞重建时间分别为(12.43±3.67)天和(16.16±2.99)天(P<0.01),血小板重建时间分别为(14.67±6.19)天和(21.23±8.25)天(P<0.01)。PBSCT 组和 BMT 组移植后1,3,6,9及12个月的 T 细胞重建差异无统计学意义。PBSCT 组和 BMT 组移植后早期感染率分别为42.86%和53.13%(P>0.05)。PBSCT 组与 BMT 组急性 GVHD 的发生率分别为61.90% 和71.885(P>0.05);在可统计的患者中,慢性 GVHD 的发生率在 PBSCT 组和 BMT 组分别为47.06%和43.48%(P>0.05)。PBSCT 组与 BMT 组移植后分别有4例和2例复发,二者复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PBSCT 组与 BMT 组移植后2年 DFS 率分别为(50.14±12.00)% 和(59.81±8.99)%,二者差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无血缘关系供者 PBSCT 后的造血重建比BMT,但二者移植后 T 细胞重建、感染发生率、GVHD 及 DFS 的差异均无统计学意义。

Comparison of clinical outcomes between unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and bone marrow transplantation for leukemia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemopoietic reconstitution, immune reconstitution, infection, incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and clinical outcome between unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation and bone marrow (BM) transplantation for leukemias. METHODS: The clinical results of 21 leukemia patients receiving G-CSF mobilized PBSC graft from unrelated donors were compared with that of 32 patients receiving unrelated BM transplants. RESULTS: Compared with BM grafts, the PBSC graft contained significantly more nucleated cells (P = 0.000), and resulted in a significantly shorter time-to-neutrophil (12.43 +/- 3.67 vs 16.16 + 2.99 days) and platelet engraftment (14.67 +/- 6.19 vs 21.23 +/- 8.25 days), (P = 0.000 and 0.003, respectively). T cell reconstitution between the two groups differed little after transplantation. The incidences of early-stage infection (42.86% vs 53.13%), the probabilities of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (61.90% vs 71.88%), the grades III to IV aGVHD (23.81% vs 15.63%), the chronic GVHD (47.06% vs 43.48%) and the probabilities of relapse (6.90% vs 12.50%) between PBSC and BM groups all has no statistical significance (NS). The 2-year disease free survival (DFS) rates of the two groups were (50.14 +/- 12.00) % and (59.81 +/- 8.99)%, respectively also have no NS. CONCLUSION: G-CSF-mobilized unrelated donor PBSCs engraft more rapidly in the recipients as compared with conventional BM grafts. The T cell reconstitution, the incidence of infection, the incidence and severity of aGVHD and cGVHD, and the 2-year DFS rates between the two groups all have no significant differences.