| 各种剖宫产术式的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄聪,戚潜辉,高眉扬,李锦玉.各种剖宫产术式的比较[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(17):32-34. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄聪 戚潜辉 高眉扬 李锦玉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广州医学院第二附属医院妇产科,广东,广州,510260 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 研究不同术式剖宫产对产妇的影响.方法 组1(50例),皮肤横切口不缝腹膜的新式剖宫产术.组2(48例),皮肤横切口缝合腹膜的常规剖宫产术.组3(36例)皮肤纵切口的腹膜外剖宫产术3组手术分别进行比较.结果 胎儿娩出时间组1＜组2＜组3(P＜0.01),手术时间组1＜组2＜组3,(P＜0.01).术中出血量组1＜组2 ≈组3,(P＜0.01,p＞0.05).术后肛门排气时间组1＜组3＜组2,(P＜0.01).术后疼痛率组1≈组2＜组3,(P＞0.05,P＜0.01).术后病率组3＜组1＜组2,(P＜0.01).切口感染组3＜组1 ≈ 2,(P＜0.01,P＞0.05).术后排尿困难组1＜组2＜组3(P＜0.01),术中膀胱损伤组2＜组1＜组3(P＜0.01).结论 新式剖宫产术具有手术时间短,出血量少,术后肠功能恢复快,疼痛少的特点,值得推广.腹膜外剖宫产术能明显降低术后病率及切口感染率,是剖宫产术的必要补充.
|
| 关 键 词： | 剖宫产 腹膜 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-1245(2006)17-0032-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-06-17 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年6月17日 |
A Comparative Study of Different Operational Methods of Caesarean Section |
| |
| HUANG Cong,QI Qianhui,GAO Meiyang,LI Jinyu.A Comparative Study of Different Operational Methods of Caesarean Section[J].International Medicine & Health Guidance News,2006,12(17):32-34. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Cong QI Qianhui GAO Meiyang LI Jinyu |
| |
| Institution: | Dept. of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical college, Guangzhou 510260, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To study the influence of different operational methods of caesarean section on maternity.Methods Group I (50 cases): hypogastrium horizontal incision non-closure peritoneum, The Misgav-ladach-method caesarean section. Group II (48 cases):hypogastrium horizontal incision closure peritoneum,The conventional caesarean section. Group III (36 cases): hypogastrium vertical incision, The extraperitoneal caesarean section.Results A comparative study of the above three groups reveals findings as follows:Time of fetus delivery,Group I 0.05).Postoperative anus exsufflation,Group I 0.05,P<0.01). Postoperative morbidity, Group III 0.05). Postoperative dysuria, Group I
|
| |
| Keywords: | Caesarean Section Peritoneum |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
