Usefulness of fat-suppressed Gd-enhanced MR imaging of tongue cancer |
| |
Authors: | Shumei Murakami D.D.S. Ph.D. Hajime Fuchihata D.D.S. Ph.D. Sukja Yoon D.D.S. Souhei Furukawa D.D.S. Ph.D. Tadahiko Kawai D.D.S. Ph.D. Mitsunobu Kishino D.D.S. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Osaka University, 1-8, Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871 Osaka, Japan;(2) Clinical Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the fat suppression technique for magnetic resonance imaging of oral tongue cancer. Methods One hundred and fourteen patients underwent both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). All patients were clinically diagnosed as having oral tongue cancer shown to be squamous cell carcinoma histopathologically. We used two types of CT and six types of MRI scanning: plain CT, contrast enhanced CT, conventional T1w, conventional PDw, conventional T2w, fat-suppressed (FATS) T1w, Gd-enhanced conventional T1w, and Gd-enhanced FATS T1w images. The focus of our study was Gd-enhanced FATS T1w imaging. Results Tumor detection rates were as follows: Gd-enhanced FATS T1w MRI, 86.8%; conventional T2w MRI, 71.9%; conventional PDw MRI, 65.8%; Gd-enhanced conventional T1w MRI, 47.4%; contrast enhanced CT, 36.8%; T1w MRI, 20.2%; CT, 10.5%. There were 59 cases in which tumors were detected by Gd-enhanced FATS T1w MRI but not detected by contrast enhanced CT. Conclusions Gd-enhanced FATS T1w MRI was the best for the tumor detection and Gd-enhanced conventional T1w MRI was not useful in the diagnosis of the tongue cancer. CT imaging must not be the first choice for tumor detection in tongue cancer patients. |
| |
Keywords: | MRI Fat suppression Tongue cancer Diagnosis |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|