| 抗生素药品干燥失重与费休氏水分测定方法比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邹云,项中华,洪田谷,王有林.抗生素药品干燥失重与费休氏水分测定方法比较[J].黑龙江医药,2007,20(1):39-40. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邹云 项中华 洪田谷 王有林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宣城市药品检验所,242000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:通过比较试验考察两种水分测定方法有无显著性差异。方法:应用常压干燥失重法及费休氏法进行水分测定。结果:通过试验比较,干燥失重水分测定法与费休氏水分测定法无显著性差异。结论:部分药品的水分测定可用干燥失重法代替药典规定的费休氏法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 水分测定法 干燥失重水分测定法 费休氏水分测定法 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-2882(2007)01-039-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-08-28 |
Comparison between the Loss on Drying Method and the Karl Fisher Reaction Method for Determining Antibiotic Drugs |
| |
| ZouYun, et al.Comparison between the Loss on Drying Method and the Karl Fisher Reaction Method for Determining Antibiotic Drugs[J].Heilongjiang Medicine,2007,20(1):39-40. |
| |
| Authors: | ZouYun |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective:To determine whether the two moisture measuring methods bold significant difference by com- parative test.Method:To apply the loss on drying method under normal pressure and the Karl fischer reation method both.Result:According to comparison,the two testing methods bold no significant difference in result.Conclu- sion:For some of the drugs,we can apply the loss on drying method under normal pressure instead of the Karl fischer reaction method for moisture content testing. |
| |
| Keywords: | moisture measuring method loss on drying under normal pressure method the Karl fisher reaction method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
