首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive disease: is carotid imaging justified?
引用本文:McCullough HK,Reinert CG,Hynan LS,Albiston CL,Inman MH,Boyd PI,Welborn MB,Clagett GP,Modrall JG. Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive disease: is carotid imaging justified?[J]. Journal of vascular surgery, 2004, 40(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.05.004
作者姓名:McCullough HK  Reinert CG  Hynan LS  Albiston CL  Inman MH  Boyd PI  Welborn MB  Clagett GP  Modrall JG
摘    要:

收稿时间:2004-01-12

Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive disease: is carotid imaging justified?
McCullough Heath K,Reinert Carol G,Hynan Linda S,Albiston Christy L,Inman Mary H,Boyd Patty I,Welborn M Burress,Clagett G Patrick,Modrall J Gregory. Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive disease: is carotid imaging justified?[J]. Journal of vascular surgery, 2004, 40(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.05.004
Authors:McCullough Heath K  Reinert Carol G  Hynan Linda S  Albiston Christy L  Inman Mary H  Boyd Patty I  Welborn M Burress  Clagett G Patrick  Modrall J Gregory
Affiliation:Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75390, USA.
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Hemispheric neurologic symptoms, amaurosis fugax, and Hollenhorst plaques at eye examination are standard indications for carotid imaging to identify carotid artery occlusive disease (CAOD). Previous reports have suggested that other ocular findings, such as retinal artery occlusion and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, are associated with CAOD. However, the predictive value of ocular findings for the presence of CAOD is controversial. The purpose of this study was to define the predictive value of ocular symptoms and ophthalmologic examination in identifying significant CAOD. METHODS: Over 3 years 145 patients were referred for carotid imaging on the basis of ocular indications in 160 eyes. Forty patients were excluded because of concurrent non-ocular indications for carotid imaging, leaving 105 patients referred exclusively for ocular indications to evaluate. Ophthalmologic history and eye examination were correlated with carotid duplex ultrasound findings. RESULTS: Amaurosis fugax was associated with a positive scan in 20.0% of carotid arteries (P =.022). Hollenhorst plaques at fundoscopic examination were associated with a positive scan in 18.2% of carotid arteries (P =.02). Ocular findings exclusive of Hollenhorst plaques were particularly poor predictors of CAOD, inasmuch as only 1 of 64 arteries (1.6%) had significant ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (P =.022). Venous stasis retinopathy was the only ocular finding other than Hollenhorst plaques with any predictive value (1 of 5 scans positive; positive predictive value, 20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular symptoms and findings are poor predictors of CAOD. Amaurosis fugax, Hollenhorst plaques, and venous stasis retinopathy demonstrated moderate predictive value, whereas all other ocular findings demonstrated no predictive value in identifying CAOD.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号