首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The Handgrip Strength Test as a Measure of Function in Breast Cancer Survivors: Relationship to Cancer-Related Symptoms and Physical and Physiologic Parameters
Authors:Cantarero-Villanueva Irene  Fernández-Lao Carolina  Díaz-Rodríguez Lourdes  Fernández-de-Las-Peñas Cesar  Ruiz Jonatan R  Arroyo-Morales Manuel
Affiliation:From the Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences (IC-V, CF-L, MA-M), Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences (LD-R), and Department of Physical Education and Sport, School of Sport Sciences (JRR), University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, University Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain (CF-d-l-P); and Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Unit for Preventive Nutrition at NOVUM, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (JRR).
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of muscular strength, as measured by the handgrip strength (HGS) test, with pain, fitness, fatigue, mood, and autonomic nervous system function in breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study comprising 95 breast cancer survivors was conducted. HGS; heart rate variability; pressure pain threshold of the neck, shoulder, hand, and tibia of the affected side; and fitness level (6-min walk test, neck-shoulder mobility, vertical jump, sit-to-stand test, and trunk curl test) were assessed as outcomes. Participants completed the Fatigue Piper Scale and Profile of Mood States questionnaires and the neck-shoulder visual analog scale. Correlation was conducted to examine the relationship of HGS with pain, fitness, fatigue, and mood. RESULTS: We observed a fair relationship of HGS with shoulder pain and a moderate to fair relationship with fitness (all P < 0.01; ρ range, 0.24-0.56). The relationship between HGS and heart rate variability (high-frequency domain) was weak (P = 0.049, ρ = 0.23). Likewise, the relationship between HGS and Profile of Mood States subscales ranged from weak to fair (all P < 0.001; ρ range, -0.22 to -0.36). HGS showed a weak relationship with Fatigue Piper Scale (all P < 0.01; ρ range, -0.28 to -0.35). Passive shoulder flexion, fatigue, and vertical jump were independent and significant predictors of HGS (P < 0.01; R = 0.466). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the HGS test might be an important correlate of health in breast cancer survivors. This finding suggests that HGS could be recommended as an adjuvant method of evaluation, which may help with efficiency of clinical practice. Further research on breast cancer patients is needed to confirm or refute these findings.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号