首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

单光子发射计算机体层摄影术和CT同机融合在诊断口腔癌侵犯下颌骨中的临床价值
引用本文:贾暮云,段青云,YUAN Rong-tao,尚伟,ZHAO Jie,王国明. 单光子发射计算机体层摄影术和CT同机融合在诊断口腔癌侵犯下颌骨中的临床价值[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2008, 43(8)
作者姓名:贾暮云  段青云  YUAN Rong-tao  尚伟  ZHAO Jie  王国明
作者单位:1. 青岛大学医学院附属医院口腔颌面外科,山东,266003
2. 杭州市第一人民医院口腔科
3. 病理科,3266003,山东,核医学科,山东,266003
基金项目:山东省青岛市科技发展基金 
摘    要:目的 研究单光子发射计算机体层摄影术(single photon emission computed tomography,SPECT)与计算机体层摄影术(CT)同机融合在口腔癌侵犯下颌骨中的诊断价值.方法 将34例口腔癌侵犯下颌骨行下颌骨节段性切除患者分为两组:A组28例为外周侵犯型;B组6例为中心侵犯型.对比研究CT、SPECT-CT、手术标本组织病理学检查的范围,分别对CT及SPECT的检查结果 进行定量研究.结果 A组:SPECT-CT、CT和病理学测量3种方法 确定下颌骨受侵犯范围分别为(5.7±1.2)cm、(3.3±1.2)cm、(4.7±1.1)cm.SPECT-CT显示下颌骨受侵犯的范嗣较病理检查高估1.0 am,CT显示骨侵犯范围较病理检查低估1.4 cm,CT与SPECT-CT的结果 相差2.4 cm,3种检查方法 显示的下颌骨侵犯范围比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).B组:SPECT-CT、CT和病理学测最结果 分别为(6.4±1.2)cm、(2.2±1.6)cm、(5.2±1.2)cm.SPECT-CT比病理检查高估1.2 cm,比CT显示的骨侵犯范围高估4.2 cm,cT比病理检杳低估3.0 cm,3种检查方法 显示的下颌骨受侵范围比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 SPECT-CT可早期发现CT不能显示的颌骨中心型肿瘤,显示的病变范围符合手术需要切除的合理范围;CT显示的病变范围受肿瘤类型的影响较大,需视肿瘤类型确定切骨范围;在排除骨扫描假阴性的前提下,下颌骨肿瘤只需SPECT-CT或CT一种检查,即可推测病变侵犯范围.

关 键 词:头颈部肿瘤  体层摄影术,螺旋计算机  单光子发射计算机体层摄影术

The value of single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography in diagnosis of carcinoma invasion of mandible
JIA Mu-yun,DUAN Qing-yun,YUAN Rong-tao,SHANG Wei,ZHAO Jie,WANG Guo-ming. The value of single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography in diagnosis of carcinoma invasion of mandible[J]. Chinese journal of stomatology, 2008, 43(8)
Authors:JIA Mu-yun  DUAN Qing-yun  YUAN Rong-tao  SHANG Wei  ZHAO Jie  WANG Guo-ming
Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis of oral carcinoma invasion to mandible. Methods Thirty-four patients with oral carcinoma invasion to mandible were divided into two groups, group A (surrounding invasion) and group B (central invasion). The edge of the invasion was evaluated by SPECT-CT, CT and pathological examination. The results of CT and SPECT-CT were analyzed by quantitative methods. Results In group A,the cancer-invaded area of the mandible exhibited on SPECT-CT was 1.0 cm lager than that on pathological examination, 2. 4 cm lager than that on CT. The difference of invaded areas hown on CT was 1.4 cm smaller than that of pathological examination. There were significant difference among the three methods. In group B, the affected area on SPECT-CT was 1.2 cm lager than that of pathological examination, 4. 2 cm lager than that of CT. The invision area on CT was 3. 0 cm smaller tha nthat of pathological examination. There were significant difference among the three methods. Conclusions SPECT-CT could find the jaw central tumor earlier than CT and the range of lesion showed by SPECT-CT was the adequate range of bone incision during operation. The range of lesion showed by CT was influenced by the type of tumor and the range of bone incision was determined according to the pathological type. If the false negative result was eliminated, only SPECT-CT or CT was needed to estimate the invasion range of mandible.
Keywords:Head and neck neoplasma  Tomography,spiral computed  Single photon emissioncomputed tomography
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号