Ion-binding properties of a K+ channel selectivity filter in different conformations

K⁺ channels are membrane proteins that selectively conduct K⁺ ions across lipid bilayers. Many voltage-gated K⁺ (K_V) channels contain two gates, one at the bundle crossing on the intracellular side of the membrane and another in the selectivity filter. The gate at the bundle crossing is responsible for channel opening in response to a voltage stimulus, whereas the gate at the selectivity filter is responsible for C-type inactivation. Together, these regions determine when the channel conducts ions. The K⁺ channel from Streptomyces lividians (KcsA) undergoes an inactivation process that is functionally similar to K_V channels, which has led to its use as a practical system to study inactivation. Crystal structures of KcsA channels with an open intracellular gate revealed a selectivity filter in a constricted conformation similar to the structure observed in closed KcsA containing only Na⁺ or low K⁺]. However, recent work using a semisynthetic channel that is unable to adopt a constricted filter but inactivates like WT channels challenges this idea. In this study, we measured the equilibrium ion-binding properties of channels with conductive, inactivated, and constricted filters using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). EPR spectroscopy was used to determine the state of the intracellular gate of the channel, which we found can depend on the presence or absence of a lipid bilayer. Overall, we discovered that K⁺ ion binding to channels with an inactivated or conductive selectivity filter is different from K⁺ ion binding to channels with a constricted filter, suggesting that the structures of these channels are different.K⁺ channels are found in all three domains of life, where they selectively conduct K⁺ ions across cell membranes. Specific stimuli trigger the activation of K⁺ channels, which results in a hinged movement of the inner helix bundle (1–7). This opening on the intracellular side of the membrane initiates ion conduction across the membrane by allowing ions to enter into the channel. After a period, many channels spontaneously inactivate to attenuate the response (8–17). The inactivation process is a timer that terminates the flow of ions in the presence of an activator to help shape the response of the system. Two dominant types of inactivation have been characterized in voltage-dependent channels: N-type and C-type (18). N-type inactivation is fast and involves an N-terminal positively charged “ball” physically plugging the pore of the channel when the membrane is depolarized. C-type inactivation, on the other hand, is a slower process involving a conformational change in the selectivity filter that is initiated by a functional link between the intracellular gate and the selectivity filter (10, 19).Several experimental observations indicate a role for the selectivity filter in C-type inactivation. First, mutations in and around the selectivity filter can alter the kinetics of inactivation (20–23). Second, increasing concentrations of extracellular K⁺ ions decrease the rate of inactivation, as if the ions are stabilizing the conductive conformation of the channel to prevent a conformational change in the selectivity filter (14, 16, 17, 22). Finally, a loss of selectivity of K⁺ over Na⁺ has been observed during the inactivation process in Shaker channels, suggesting a role for the selectivity filter (24, 25). Together, these data indicate that channels in their inactivated and conductive conformations interact with K⁺ ions differently, and suggest that C-type inactivation involves a conformational change in the selectivity filter. Although several structures of K⁺ channels in their conductive state have been solved using X-ray crystallography, there is at present no universally accepted model for the C-type inactivated channel (1, 3–5, 9, 19, 26–28) (Fig. 1B).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Macroscopic recordings and structural models of KcsA K⁺ channel. (A) Macroscopic currents of WT KcsA obtained by a pH jump from pH 8 to pH 4 reveal channel inactivation. Two models representing the conformation of the channel are shown below. (B) Conductive Left, Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 1K4C] and constricted (Right, PDB ID code 1K4D) conformations of the selectivity filter are shown as sticks, and the ion-binding sites are indicated with green spheres. The thermodynamic properties of the conductive, constricted, and inactivated (Middle) conformations are the subject of this study.Inactivation in the K⁺ channel from Streptomyces lividians (KcsA) has many of the same functional properties of C-type inactivation, which has made it a model to understand its structural features (20). KcsA channels transition from their closed to open gate upon changing the intracellular pH from high to low (Fig. 1A). The rapid flux of ions through the channel is then attenuated by channel inactivation, where most open WT channels are not conducting, suggesting that crystal structures of open KcsA channels would reveal the inactivated channel. In some crystal structures of truncated WT KcsA solved with an open gate, the selectivity filter appears in the constricted conformation, similar to the conformation observed in structures of the KcsA channel determined in the presence of only Na⁺ ions or low concentrations of K⁺ ions (3, 10, 29, 30) (Fig. 1B). Solid-state and solution NMR also indicate that the selectivity filter of the KcsA channel is in the constricted conformation when the cytoplasmic gate is open (31–33).However, a recently published study shows that even when the constricted conformation of KcsA’s selectivity filter is prevented by a nonnatural amino acid substitution, the channel inactivates like WT channels, suggesting the constricted filter does not correspond to the functionally observed inactivation in KcsA (28). In this study, we use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to quantify the ion-binding properties of WT and mutant KcsA K⁺ channels with their selectivity filters in different conformations and EPR spectroscopy to determine the conformation of the channels’ intracellular gates. A comparison of these ion-binding properties leads us to conclude that the conductive and inactivated filters are energetically more similar to each other than the constricted and inactivated filters.