首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

甘精胰岛素合用格列美脲与门冬胰岛素30治疗2型糖尿病的对比观察
引用本文:刘飞.甘精胰岛素合用格列美脲与门冬胰岛素30治疗2型糖尿病的对比观察[J].中国现代医生,2012,50(18):65-66.
作者姓名:刘飞
作者单位:沈阳市第四人民医院内分泌科,辽宁沈阳,110031
摘    要:目的比较甘精胰岛素合用格列美脲与诺和锐30治疗口服降糖药未达标的2型糖尿病患者的疗效与低血糖发生的风险。方法62例血糖控制未达标的2型糖尿病患者,随机分为甘精胰岛素合用格列美脲组31例(A组)与诺和锐30治疗组31例(B组),治疗12周。结果两组治疗后FPG、2hPG、HbA1c均较治疗前明显下降(P〈0.01),治疗后两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),低血糖发生率A组低于B组(P〈0.05)。两组均无严重不良事件发生。结论甘精胰岛素联合格列美脲与门冬胰岛素30两种方案都能使血糖有效达标,甘精胰岛素组低廊糖发生率低、对患者体重影响小、使用方便、患者依从性好。

关 键 词:2型糖尿病(T2DM)  甘精胰岛素(来得时)  格列美脲片(亚莫利)  门冬胰岛素30(诺和锐30)

Comparison of insulin glargine combined with glimepiride and BIAsp 30 in treatment of type 2 diabetes
Authors:LIU Fei
Institution:LIU Fei Department of Endocrinology,NO.4 Hospital of Shenyang City,Shenyang 110031,China
Abstract:Objective To compare insulin glargine combined with the risk of Glimepiride and aspart 30 treatment of oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes did not meet the efficacy and low blood sugar.Methods All of 62 patients glycemic control did not meet the Type 2 diabetic patients were randomly divided into the reorganization of the combination of insulin glargine to glimepiride group of 31 cases(group A) and aspart 30 treatment group,31 cases(B group),12 weeks of treatment.Results After treatment,FPG,2 hPG,HbA1c compared with treatment decreased significantly(P < 0.01) after treatment,no significant difference between the two groups(P > 0.05),the incidence of hypoglycemia was lower than group B(P < 0.05).There were no serious adverse events.Conclusion The insulin glargine with glimepiride tablets and aspartate insulin 30 two kinds of programs can make blood glucose effective compliance,insulin glargine group of low blood sugar low incidence,little impact on patient weight,easy to use,good patient compliance.
Keywords:Type 2 diabetes(T2DM)  Insulin glargine(Lantus)  Glimepiride tablets(Amaryl)  Insulin aspart 30(Aspart 30)
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号