首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) screening by enzyme immunoassay with nuclear HEp-2 cell extract and recombinant antigens: analytical and clinical evaluation
Authors:González Concepción  Guevara Paloma  Alarcón Inmaculada  Hernando Monserrat  Navajo José Alejandro  González-Buitrago José Manuel
Institution:Servicio de Bioquímica, Laboratorio de Autoinmunidad, Hospital Universitario, Salamanca, Spain.
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) has been the standard method for antinuclear antibodies (ANA). To simplify and standardize the ANA test, generic ANA solid phase enzyme immunoassay has been promoted. The objective of the present work has been to study the relationship with IFA and the clinical usefulness of a generic EIA for ANA (COBAS Core HEp-2 ANA EIA, Roche Diagnostics). DESIGNS AND METHODS: We studied 74 healthy individuals, 119 patients with defined systemic autoimmune diseases, 26 patients with other autoimmune diseases, and 490 routine samples sent to laboratory for ANA analysis. RESULTS: Precision study showed intra-assay coefficient of variations (CVs) below 8% and inter-assay CVs below 10%. In relation to IFA, a 0.6 kappa index of agreement was obtained. COBAS-ANA concentrations increased according to IFA titer and greatest COBAS-ANA responses were obtained with pure or mixed homogeneous patterns and centromeric patterns. Analysis of COBAS-ANA response to particular antigenic specificities showed that SS-B, Scl-70 and U1sn-RNP specificities were saturating at high concentrations, whereas Jo-1, SS-A and nuclear and centromeric specificities exhibited lower responses. Elevated serum concentrations of IgG and IgM did not interfere COBAS-ANA, but high serum rheumatoid factor (RF) concentrations produced a decrease of ANA. For systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, the COBAS-ANA best efficiency was obtained with a cut-off of 0.9, with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 88%, whereas the best IFA-ANA efficiency was obtained with a 1:80 dilution, giving a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 99%. There were no differences between areas under ROC curves for COBAS-ANA and IFA-ANA. For other systemic and nonsystemic autoimmune diseases sensitivity and specificity of COBAS-ANA were similar or higher than that of 1:160 IFA-ANA titer. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity and specificity of COBAS Core ANA-EIA for SLE and other systemic and nonsystemic autoimmune diseases, together with performance characteristics make it an adequate automated system for ANA screening.
Keywords:Antinuclear antibodies  Autoimmune diseases  Enzyme immunoassay  Indirect immunofluorescence
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号