首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Comparison of pain management after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without epidural analgesia
Authors:Yoshitomo Yanagimoto  Shuji Takiguchi  Yasuhiro Miyazaki  Jota Mikami  Tomoki Makino  Tsuyoshi Takahashi  Yukinori Kurokawa  Makoto Yamasaki  Hiroshi Miyata  Kiyokazu Nakajima  Masaki Mori  Yuichiro Doki
Institution:1.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine,Osaka University,Osaka,Japan
Abstract:

Purpose

The optimal analgesia following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) has not been determined; moreover, it has been unclear whether epidural anesthesia has benefits for laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of epidural analgesia after LDG.

Methods

This retrospective study included 84 patients who underwent LDG for gastric cancer. Patients received either combined thoracic epidural and general anesthesia (Epidural group, n = 34) or general anesthesia alone (No epidural group, n = 50). We recorded data on the patients, surgery, postoperative outcomes and anesthesia-related complications.

Results

In the Epidural group, the first day of flatus was significantly earlier (2.21 vs. 2.44 days, p = 0.045) and the number of additional doses of analgesics was significantly lower (2.85 vs. 4.86 doses, p = 0.007) than in the No epidural group. Postoperative urinary retention occurred at a significantly higher rate in the Epidural group (n = 7; 20.6 %) than in the No epidural group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Epidural anesthesia may reduce the need for additional analgesics after LDG, but increases the risk of urinary retention.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号