Toward automation of germline variant curation in clinical cancer genetics |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Niehaus Center For Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;2. Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;3. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA;;4. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;5. Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;6. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.;1. Niehaus Center For Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;2. Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;3. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA;;4. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;5. Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;;6. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeCancer care professionals are confronted with interpreting results from multiplexed gene sequencing of patients at hereditary risk for cancer. Assessments for variant classification now require orthogonal data searches and aggregation of multiple lines of evidence from diverse resources. The clinical genetics community needs a fast algorithm that automates American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) based variant classification and provides uniform results.MethodsPathogenicity of Mutation Analyzer (PathoMAN) automates germline genomic variant curation from clinical sequencing based on ACMG guidelines. PathoMAN aggregates multiple tracks of genomic, protein, and disease specific information from public sources. We compared expertly curated variant data from clinical laboratories to assess performance.ResultsPathoMAN achieved a high overall concordance of 94.4% for pathogenic and 81.1% for benign variants. We observed negligible discordance (0.3% pathogenic, 0% benign) when contrasted against expert curated variants. Some loss of resolution (5.3% pathogenic, 18.9% benign) and gain of resolution (1.6% pathogenic, 3.8% benign) were also observed.ConclusionAutomation of variant curation enables unbiased, fast, efficient delivery of results in both clinical and laboratory research. We highlight the advantages and weaknesses related to the programmable automation of variant classification. PathoMAN will aid in rapid variant classification by generating robust models using a knowledgebase of diverse genetic data (https://pathoman.mskcc.org). |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|