首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


VH replacement in primary immunoglobulin repertoire diversification
Authors:Amy Sun  Tatiana I. Novobrantseva  Maryaline Coffre  Susannah L. Hewitt  Kari Jensen  Jane A. Skok  Klaus Rajewsky  Sergei B. Koralov
Affiliation:aDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016; and;bImmune Disease Institute, Boston, MA, 02115
Abstract:The genes encoding the variable (V) region of the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) are assembled from V, D (diversity), and J (joining) elements through a RAG-mediated recombination process that relies on the recognition of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) flanking the individual elements. Secondary V(D)J rearrangement modifies the original Ig rearrangement if a nonproductive original joint is formed, as a response to inappropriate signaling from a self-reactive BCR, or as part of a stochastic mechanism to further diversify the Ig repertoire. VH replacement represents a RAG-mediated secondary rearrangement in which an upstream VH element recombines with a rearranged VHDHJH joint to generate a new BCR specificity. The rearrangement occurs between the cryptic RSS of the original VH element and the conventional RSS of the invading VH gene, leaving behind a footprint of up to five base pairs (bps) of the original VH gene that is often further obscured by exonuclease activity and N-nucleotide addition. We have previously demonstrated that VH replacement can efficiently rescue the development of B cells that have acquired two nonproductive heavy chain (IgH) rearrangements. Here we describe a novel knock-in mouse model in which the prerearranged IgH locus resembles an endogenously rearranged productive VHDHJH allele. Using this mouse model, we characterized the role of VH replacement in the diversification of the primary Ig repertoire through the modification of productive VHDHJH rearrangements. Our results indicate that VH replacement occurs before Ig light chain rearrangement and thus is not involved in the editing of self-reactive antibodies.A hallmark of the adaptive immune system is its ability to generate a large antibody repertoire despite a limited genome through the rearrangement of variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) genes during B-cell development in a process called V(D)J recombination (1). Each antibody-producing cell expresses a single pair of heavy and light chains generated by this process during the pro–B-cell and pre–B-cell stages of development, respectively. V(D)J recombination is mediated by the recombination activating proteins RAG1 and RAG2, which bind and cleave recombination recognition sequences (RSSs) flanking V, D, and J genes. Because there are several members of V, D (for the heavy chain), and J segments, the combinatorial nature of V(D)J rearrangement allows for the generation of a vastly diverse antibody repertoire from a relatively modest amount of genetic information present in the germline DNA.Ig gene rearrangement progresses in an ordered stepwise manner during B-cell development, with Ig heavy (IgH) chain assembly before Ig light (IgL) chain assembly. In-frame rearrangement of a VHDHJH joint leads to expression of an IgH chain that pairs with an invariant surrogate light chain, and, in association with the Igα and Igβ signal-transducing subunits, these proteins form the pre–B-cell receptor (pre-BCR) (2, 3). Signaling through a functional pre-BCR allows the cell to progress from the pro–B-cell stage to the pre–B-cell stage, where IgL rearrangement can occur. This progression is accompanied by a burst of proliferation, which ensures that the functional IgH rearrangement is not lost in the event of unsuccessful IgL recombination and increases diversity by allowing a given IgH chain to pair with multiple IgL chains. Only cells that acquire a functional B-cell receptor (BCR), with an in-frame rearranged IgH chain that successfully pairs with a productively rearranged IgL chain, progress to become mature B cells.The imprecise nature of the joining process in V(D)J recombination contributes to the diversity of the antibody repertoire, but also leads to a significant number of nonfunctional rearrangements, with approximately two-thirds of the joints being out-of-frame. At the IgH locus, VH replacement can rescue “dead-end” pro-B cells that have acquired nonproductive IgH joints on both alleles by rearranging an upstream VH gene with a nonfunctional VHDHJH (47).Ordered rearrangement of the IgH and IgL loci is mediated by the RAG1/2 proteins that recognize RSSs flanking V, D, and J segments. The consensus RSS is composed of a heptamer (CACTGTG) and a nonamer (GGTTTTTGT) separated by either a 12-bp or 23-bp spacer (8). V(D)J recombination occurs preferentially between gene segments flanked by RSSs of dissimilar lengths, thus directing the order of recombination; this is known as the 12/23 rule. Because the VHDHJH recombination process eliminates any remaining DH genes and their flanking 12-bp RSSs, further editing of this locus requires a recombination event that violates the 12/23 rule. VH replacement occurs between a 23-bp RSS of an upstream invading VH gene and a highly conserved 7-bp cryptic RSS (cRSS; TACTGTG) in the body of the recipient VH gene (6, 7). Because the cRSS is located near the 3′ terminus of the recipient VH gene, this process leaves behind only 5 bps proximal to the highly variable CDR3 region of the original VHDHJH joint, a minimal footprint that can be modified by exonuclease “chewback” and N-nucleotide addition (9, 10).VH replacement was initially observed in mouse B-cell lines in which a small fraction of cells regularly acquired alternate IgH rearrangements, thus “editing” their original specificity (6, 7). Since then, VH replacement has been studied in transgenic mouse models, human cell lines, and human blood. Recent studies that bioinformatically examined the frequency of 4- to 5-bp VH footprints at the VH-DH vs. DH-JH junctions have suggested evidence of VH replacement in at least 5% of the human Ig repertoire (9). Analysis of VH footprints in mouse IgH rearrangements revealed a similar frequency of VH replacement in wild-type (WT) mice, and also demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of VH replacement footprints in IgH sequences from patients with autoimmune diseases and animals of autoimmune-prone backgrounds (11, 12). However, the random nature of exonuclease and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) activity at the CDR3 region of IgH joints makes it difficult to assess the contribution of VH replacement to the repertoire by sequence analysis, owing to loss of the VH footprint. Furthermore, our earlier work with a mouse model carrying a predefined nonproductive IgH rearrangement in the IgH locus has demonstrated that up to one-third of VH replacement events are mediated by sequence microhomology of the highly conserved 3′ bases of VH genes (4). Replacement reactions of this nature lack a detectable footprint and thus escape detection by sequence analysis.Although the nonproductive VHDHJH mouse model allowed us to study how VH replacement rescues nonproductive VHDHJH rearrangements, it did not address the contribution of VH replacement to the diversification of the primary immune repertoire or its role in editing self-reactive antibody specificities. Thus, we generated a knock-in mouse with a productive VHDHJH rearrangement knocked into its physiological position within the IgH locus. With this mouse model, we assessed the role of VH replacement in modifying productive IgH rearrangements in nonautoreactive and autoreactive settings.
Keywords:VH replacement   receptor editing   lymphocyte development   secondary rearrangement   V(D)J
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号