Differential Diagnosis of Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Stage I Malignant Ovarian Tumors using FDG PET/CT |
| |
Authors: | Chulhan Kim Hyun Hoon Chung So Won Oh Keon Wook Kang June-Key Chung Dong Soo Lee |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-Ro-5-Gil, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 156-707, Seoul, Republic of Korea 4. Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, WCU Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
|
| |
Abstract: | PurposeBorderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are more common in young women of reproductive age, and exhibit a better prognosis than malignant ovarian tumors (MOTs). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were compared in their ability to differentiate BOTs from stage I MOTs.MethodsAmong 173 patients who had preoperative FDG PET/CT due to ovarian neoplasms between November 2006 and March 2009, there were 13 patients with BOTs or stage I MOTs. For differential diagnosis of the two tumors, cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) level, the longest diameter of tumors, metabolic indices including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and volumetric indices including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were compared, respectively.ResultsThe BOT group (n = 7) was comprised of five mucinous and two serous tumors, and the MOT group (n = 6) was comprised of three endometrioid, two clear cell and one mucinous tumors. Among the comparisons between two groups, SUVmax of the BOT group was significantly lower than that of the MOT group (2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.9, p = 0.0223); otherwise, no significant difference was found in age, CA-125, diameter, or MTV. By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, SUVmax of 3.7 was the best cutoff value to differentiate BOTs from stage I MOTs, with a sensitivity of 83.3 % and specificity of 85.7, and the area under curve of 0.893 (p = 0.0001, 95 % CI: 0.601∼0.993).ConclusionsWe demonstrated that SUVmax could distinguish BOTs from stage I MOTs, with a high sensitivity and specificity. Metabolic indices determined by FDG PET/CT were more suitable than volumetric indices for differential diagnosis of the two tumors. |
| |
Keywords: | Borderline ovarian tumor Stage I malignant ovarian tumor FDG PET/CT Standard uptake value (SUV) Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|