首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

浅谈系统评价的文献偏倚问题
引用本文:屈会起,林珊,邱明才.浅谈系统评价的文献偏倚问题[J].循证医学,2001,1(1):55-57.
作者姓名:屈会起  林珊  邱明才
作者单位:天津医科大学总医院内科,天津,300052
摘    要:文献偏倚是指由于无法全面地获得相关的临床研究资料,从而影响系统评价结果的真实性。常见的文献偏倚主要包括:1)文献发表偏倚,指某些研究始终不能被发表或被延迟发表;2)文献查寻偏倚,指系统评价过程中。没有全面地获得已发表的相关文献;3)文献筛选偏倚,是由于文献筛选不当,错误地剔除了某些有用的文献。文献偏倚评估的常用方法是以各研究的样本量为横坐标,作用大小为纵坐标,绘制漏斗形图。

关 键 词:系统评价  文献偏倚  临床研究  发表偏倚  文献筛选  系统评价
修稿时间:2001年5月28日

Elementary introduction to studies bias of systematic reviews
Qu Huiqi,Lin Shan,Qiu MingcaiInternal Medicine.Elementary introduction to studies bias of systematic reviews[J].The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2001,1(1):55-57.
Authors:Qu Huiqi  Lin Shan  Qiu MingcaiInternal Medicine
Institution:Qu Huiqi,Lin Shan,Qiu MingcaiInternal Medicine Department,General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300052,P. R. China
Abstract:Literature bias, which can reduce the validity of a systematic review, comes mainly from the fact that all the related studies can not be collected without exception. The following three types of literature bias are most common. 1) Publication bias. The reason is that some studies can not get published, or the publication has been delayed. 2) Literature retrieval bias. This bias is the result that not all published studies are retrieved during the course of systematic review. 3) Literature inclusion bias. While an improper literature selection strategy is adopted, some useful studies are kicked out by error, leading to such bias. A funnel plot (X-axis is sample size, Y-axis effect) is usually useful to assess literature bias in a systematic review.
Keywords:evidence-based medicine  systematic review  literature bias
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《循证医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《循证医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号