首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

舌鳞状细胞癌临床N0颈清扫模式的探讨
引用本文:郭朱明,曾宗渊,陈福进,彭汉伟,魏茂文,张诠,杨安奎,陈文宽.舌鳞状细胞癌临床N0颈清扫模式的探讨[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(2):91-94.
作者姓名:郭朱明  曾宗渊  陈福进  彭汉伟  魏茂文  张诠  杨安奎  陈文宽
作者单位:510060,广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心头颈科
基金项目:广东省医学科研基金资助项目(A2002226),广东省科技计划基金资助项目[粤科社字(2002)2543]
摘    要:目的 探讨舌鳞状细胞癌(简称鳞癌)临床N0(clinical N0,cN0)颈部合理的治疗模式,避免过度治疗和治疗不足。方法 回顾性分析1985年1月-2001年4月cN0舌鳞癌327例的临床病理资料,比较不同治疗方法对颈部控制率的影响,并进行预后和死因分析。结果 全部病例随访3年以上,总的3年生存率为69.7%(228/327),颈部治疗失败组和颈部控制组的3年生存率分别为39.1%(25/64)和77.2%(203/263);51.5%(51/99)死亡与颈部治疗失败有关;总的颈部控制率为80.4%(263/327),采取观察随访、Ⅰ区清扫、Ⅰ Ⅱ区清扫、肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术、经典性颈清扫术、功能性颈清扫术的颈部控制率分别为67.5%(27/40)、72.7%(24/33)、60.0%(15/25)、84.9%(45/55)、86.8%(131/151)、84.0%(21/25),影响颈部控制率的独立因素为颈部治疗方法和术后N分期。结论 颈部控制是cN0舌鳞癌预后的关键因素;舌鳞癌cN0颈部的治疗首选肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术;对于术后病理提示有多个淋巴结转移和(或)包膜外侵犯者应考虑术后放疗。

关 键 词:舌鳞状细胞癌  临床N0  颈清扫术  颈部控制  肩胛舌骨肌上颈清扫术
修稿时间:2004年8月26日

Management option for cervical metastases in tongue squamous cell carcinoma with clinically N0 neck
GUO Zhu-ming,ZENG Zong-yuan,CHEN Fu-jin,PENG Han-wei,WEI Mao-wen,ZHANG Quan,YANG An-kui,CHEN Wen-kuan.Management option for cervical metastases in tongue squamous cell carcinoma with clinically N0 neck[J].Chinese JOurnal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,2005,40(2):91-94.
Authors:GUO Zhu-ming  ZENG Zong-yuan  CHEN Fu-jin  PENG Han-wei  WEI Mao-wen  ZHANG Quan  YANG An-kui  CHEN Wen-kuan
Institution:Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to explore the optimal management option for cervical metastases in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with clinically N0 neck in order to avoid excessive or inadequate treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical data of 327 cases of tongue SCC with cN0 neck were retrospectively analyzed. Neck control rates affected by different pathoclinical parameters were compared. Prognosis analysis and death analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Overall 3-year survival was 69.7% (228/327), 3-year survival of neck recurrent group and non-recurrent group was 39.1% (25/64) and 77.2% (203/263), and 51.5% (51/99) of the death related to neck failure. Overall neck control rate was 80.4% (263/327); neck control rate of wait and watch group, level I neck dissection, level I + II neck dissection, supraomohyoid neck dissection, radical neck dissection, functional neck dissection, was 67.5% (27/40), 72.7% (24/33), 60.0% (15/25), 84.9% (45/55), 86.8% (131/151), 84.0% (21/25), respectively. Treatment modality and cervical lymph node involvement were independent factors for neck control. CONCLUSIONS: Neck control is a key for prognosis of tongue SCC with cN0 neck. Supraomohyoid neck dissection is the first choice in management of cervical metastases in tongue SCC with cN0 neck, during which the suspected involved lymph nodes should be sent for frozen section to determine whether comprehensive neck dissection required. Multimodal metastasis and/or capsular spread are the indications for postoperative irradiation.
Keywords:Tongue neoplasm  Carcinoma  Squamous cell  Lymphatic metastasis  Radical neck dissection
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号