Antithrombotic prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery: an historical overview and update of current recommendations |
| |
Authors: | Plamen Kinov Panayot P. Tanchev Martin Ellis Gershon Volpin |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Queen Giovanna – ISUL, Sofia, Bulgaria 2. Head Hematology Institute and Blood Bank, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Western Galilee Hospital, Naharia, Israel
|
| |
Abstract: | The risk of venous thromboembolism following major orthopaedic procedures, such as joint arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery, are well recognised and represent one of the major challenges in orthopaedic practice, having in mind the increasing number of arthroplasties of the hip and knee done worldwide per year and their successful outcome. This potentially fatal complication remains a challenge in orthopaedic practice. The percentage of patients in whom antithrombotic prophylaxis has not been administrated or has been inadequate may reach 50 %. Until recently, anticoagulant prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) has been a “gold standard”. LMWHs are indirect inhibitors of the clotting factors Xa and thrombin and are administered by daily subcutaneous injection. Their efficacy has been proven in numerous clinical trials and the rate of complications with their use is relatively low. However these compounds are associated with a failure rate and are inconvenient to administer, requiring subcutaneous injection, leading to inadequate compliance. For these reasons postoperative thrombembolism continues to occur in up to 10 % of this patient population. Recently, novel oral anticoagulants have been introduced into practice for thromboprophylaxis after joint arthroplasy and hip fracture surgery. These drugs are direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) or direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban). These oral drugs have the same efficacy as the LMWHs with the same or slightly more clinically significant haemorrhage as their main side effect. Their ease of administration and favourable clinical profile makes them an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium available for venous thromboprophylaxis. In this paper we review the aetiology and pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism and present the various alternatives for its prevention after major orthopaedic surgical procedures with emphasis on the new oral drugs. |
| |
Keywords: | Joint arthroplasty Hip fractures Venous thromboembolism DVT Thromboprophylaxis Oral anticoagulant prophylaxis LMWH Aspirin |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|