某医科大学2005—2010年试卷质量评估分析

目的了解我校试卷的编制质量、教师的命题水平、授课质量和教学效果等。方法采用《安徽医科大学试卷质量评估表》对85门课试卷进行定量分析，同时对85份试卷评估报告进行定性分析。结果85门课试卷的命题都符合或基本符合教学大纲的要求，内容存在错误的试卷占2．4％，学生成绩呈正态分布或基本呈正态分布的试卷占91．6％。85门课按照公共基础课、专业基础课及专业课进行分类，三类课程的试卷质量间差异有统计学意义（χ2=8．865，P=0．042）。不同学年试卷质量分析发现，有逐年好转趋势，但各学年间差异无统计学意义。定性分析结果显示，我校的试卷在试题规范性、命题科学性、参考答案及评分标准、阅卷、试卷分析、试卷相关附件材料保存等方面还存在一定不足。结论要进一步加强试卷的管理工作，提高教与学的质量和标准。

Assessment on quality of examination paper from 2005 to 2010 in a medical university

Objective To assess the quality of examination paper, level of examination paper proposition, teachers＇ teaching quality and teaching effect by sampling inspection of examination paper. Methods Examination papers of 85 courses were quantitatively assessed by using evaluation form of Examination Paper Quality of Anhui Medical University. Results Propositions of papers were well or largely complied with the requirements of syllabus. 2.4% of examination papers had content errors. Students＇ scores of 91.6% papers were in normal distribution. Quality of papers was improved year by year, but was significantly different among public basic courses, specialized basic courses and special- ized courses（χ2 = 8. 865, P = 0. 042 ）. The qualitative analysis resuhs showed that there were short- comings in proposition, grading, paper analysis and archiving. Conclusions Management of examination paper is needed to improve the quality of teaching and studying and pave the way for the undergrad- uate teaching evaluation.