Total pathological complete response versus breast pathological complete response in clinical trials of reference and biosimilar trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer |
| |
Authors: | Justin Stebbing Yauheni Baranau Alexey Manikhas Sang Joon Lee Paul Thiruchelvam Daniel Leff |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK;2. Chemotherapy Department #1, Minsk City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Minsk, Belarus;3. Breast Cancer Department, City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation;4. Clinical Development Division, CELLTRION Inc, Incheon, Republic of Korea |
| |
Abstract: | Introduction: Trastuzumab is a key drug in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancers that overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Pathological complete response (pCR) is commonly used as an endpoint in neoadjuvant clinical trials of trastuzumab as evidence suggests it may be a surrogate for long-term survival. Several biosimilar candidates of originator or ‘reference’ trastuzumab are in development and have used pCR as a primary endpoint to assess therapeutic equivalence between treatments. The exact definition of pCR has varied across studies. Areas covered: Here we look at the clinical relevance of pCR and compare rates of total pCR (defined as ypT0/is ypN0) and breast pCR (defined as ypT0/is) in clinical trials of reference and biosimilar trastuzumab. Expert commentary: In order to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant systemic therapies in a uniform way, standardization of trial endpoints is necessary. Future studies in HER2-positive breast cancer should include full assessment of the breast and lymph node basin before and after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and the use of total pCR as the primary outcome. |
| |
Keywords: | Biosimilar breast cancer neoadjuvant pathological complete response trastuzumab |
|
|