Comparison of Radiation Exposure in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement With Fluoroscopy Vs Computer-Assisted Image Guidance With Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging |
| |
Authors: | Harvey Smith Matthew Welsch Hatice Ugurlu Rick Sasso Alexander Vaccaro |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaharveysmith27@gmail.com;3. Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| |
Abstract: | Background/objective: Little is known about the long-term effects of chronic exposure to ionizingradiation. Studies have shown that spine surgeons may be exposed to significantly more radiation than thatobserved in surgery on the appendicular skeleton. Computer-assisted image guidance systems have beenshown in preliminary studies to enable accurate instrumentation of the spine. Computer-assisted image guidance systems may havesignificant application to the surgical management of spinal trauma and deformity. The objective of this study was to compare C-arm fluoroscopy and computer-assisted imageguidance in terms of radiation exposure to the operative surgeon when placing pedicle screw-rod constructsin cadaver specimens.Methods: Twelve single-level (2 contiguous vertebral bodies) lumbar pedicle screw-rod constructs (48screws) in 4 fresh cadavers were placed using standard C-arm fluoroscopy and computer-assisted imageguidance (Stealth Station with lso-C3D ).Pedicle screw-rod constructs were placed at L1-L2, L3-L4, and L5-S1 in 4 fresh cadaver specimens. Imaging was alternated between C-arm fluoroscopy and computer-assistedimage guidance with Stealth Station lso-C3D. Radiation exposure was measured using ringand badge dosimeters to monitor the thyroid, torso, and index finger. Postprocedure CT scans were obtained to judge accuracy of screw placement.Results: Mean radiation exposure to the torso was 4.33 ± 2.66 mRemfor procedures performed with standard fluoroscopy and 0.33 ± 0.82 mRem for procedures performed with computer-assisted image guidance. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.012). Radiation exposure to the index finger and thyroid was negligible for all procedures. The accuracy of screw placement was similar for both techniques.Conclusions: Computer-assisted image guidance systems allow for the safe and accurate placement ofpedicle screw-rod constructs with a significant reduction in exposure to ionizing radiation to the torso of theoperating surgeon. |
| |
Keywords: | C-arm fluoroscopy Radiation exposure Minimally invasive surgery, computer-assisted, Imageguided Pedicle screw Intraoperative imaging Surgical navigation systems |
|
|